Difference between revisions 100487631 and 100512528 on enwiki

< previous diff
next diff >
Talk:Musean hypernumber
There is a history of dispute with respect to the article, which can be traced from it's previous location ([[hypernumber]]), in the [[Talk:Hypernumber|talk]] page. Ignoring all the references that I gave (most of them formally published) and replacing them with a single reference to a single-user-maintained religious web site is inacceptable to me, therefore I resurrected the deleted content here as a first step. Maybe the new location, [[Musean hypernumber]], is more acceptable for the time being. Je(contracted; show full)

===Other feedback===

* The article references need to be brought up to a standard that is desired in Wikipedia. This will allow proper referencing within the article, and proper indexing and hotlinking where applicable. I'll follow-up on the desired format on references.
 - Update: Done. Jens [[User:Koeplinger|Koeplinger]] 21:11, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

* Not all articles have DOI references; I'm not sure whether I can get these for the older articles, because the journals are either defunct or have been renamed. I'll check. - Update: Done. Jens [[User:Koeplinger|Koeplinger]] 21:11, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

Looks like I'm not getting this all done in 2006, so right now it'll be mid January 2007 at the earliest. Oh well. Thanks, Jens [[User:Koeplinger|Koeplinger]] 05:10, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

* In preparation for linking individual statements and formulas directly to citations (for the upcoming article update), I noticed that the majority of formulas in the ''w'', ''p'' and ''q'', and ''m'' numbers section were original research by Kevin Carmody, which the author has now withdrawn. I will remove any formula or wording that I cannot link to a formally published article. Thanks, Jens [[User:Koeplinger|Koeplinger]] 00:38, 8 January 2007 (UTC) - Update: Mostly done (picture captions need to be adjusted). Jens [[User:Koeplinger|Koeplinger]] 21:11, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

== Notability ==

Could you add some references to where ''other'' people have referred to these numbers? As it stands, it's not clear that this material is widely studied at all, with so many references by the same author, and almost all of them in the same journal. [[User:CMummert|CMummert]] 02:50, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

(contracted; show full)
:::Thanks a lot for your detailed response. I'll incorporate the suggestions. Target date is end of January, time permitting. Thanks, Jens [[User:Koeplinger|Koeplinger]] 01:41, 12 January 2007 (UTC)