Difference between revisions 1098271 and 1126556 on enwiki<i>For this article to have the [[neutral point of view]], it should say '''who''' considers each listed group a "cult" and '''why''', balanced by similar info about those who disagree with the "cult" designation. Otherwise, it is just a list of groups that have somehow acquired a bad reputation.</i> ---- This is a list of organizations, religious groups, and sects which are purported to be cults. (contracted; show full)company, suggest that [[brainwashing]] might account for devotees' fanatical devotion to unpaid recruitment for Landmark seminars. The sometimes controversial reputation of founding [[guru]] (formerly known as "The Source") [[Werner Erhard]] often muddies debate on the alleged merits of Landmark's innovative (or [[psycho-babble]]) "technology". * [[Lifespring]] The teachings, methods and results of Lifspring and its offshoots appear comparable to those of [[est]]. * [[Church of the SubGenius]] ⏎ ⏎ The [[Church of the SubGenius]] has made numerous attempts to be included on lists of cults and controversial religious movements. This organization is widely seen as a humorous [[parody]] of religious cults, though members of the organization vehemently deny this; they state that while they are seen as a "joke desguised as a religion," in actuality they are a "religion disguised as a joke." * ⏎ * [[Plymouth Brethren]] ⏎ ⏎ The exclusive branch of the [[Plymouth Brethren]] are considered as a cult by most other cChristians, and non-religious observers as well. All content in the above text box is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license Version 4 and was originally sourced from https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=1126556.
![]() ![]() This site is not affiliated with or endorsed in any way by the Wikimedia Foundation or any of its affiliates. In fact, we fucking despise them.
|