Difference between revisions 1269209 and 1269265 on enwiki

I ran a Google test on this new entry, and its closely related variants. It returned some 7000 hits, so it passes the Google test.

[http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&q=islamofacism+OR+islamofascist+OR+islamofacists+OR+%22islamic+fascism%22+OR+%22Islamo-fascism%22 Google search on Islamofacism and related spellings.]


----
text from ''Islamfascists'' below:

(contracted; show full)

Good. Read about all those mass graves being uncovered in the news. Read about Saddam gassing his own people. Read about Saddam's evils in the Iran Iraq War. And read about Communism in Robert Conquest's books and the Black Book of Communism. The latter was written by a group of FRENCH INTELLECTUALS OF THE LEFT, your kind of people. If they can acknowedge the Communism's murderous history, then anyone intelligent and decent can. [[User:JoeM|JoeM]]


:Interesting that you mention Saddam's evils in the Iran-Iraq War. Guess on whose side the U.S. was at the time. He gassed his own people with U.S. Apaches. And those mass graves include many of the tens of thousands killed by the U.S. in the 1991 war. --[[User:Wik|Wik]] 14:49, Aug 10, 2003 (UTC)



:Just give some links for webpages, so this can be done easyly. I know about gassing Kurds in Iraq, and some of the evils in the Iran-Iraq War are included in the Saddam Hussein article. The Black Book of Communism was written by French Intellectuals, but not by left ones -- and is disputed. But besides, I even know that communism has a murderous history. But all this things aren't related to the "facts" of your article. Give a precise source for the assumption that there were killed millions(contracted; show full)


I've unprotected this page again, as its protection has simply caused  [[User:JoeM|JoeM]] to spam his stuff under multiple article titles. Joe genuinely does not seem to understand why we are doing what we are doing, and appears not to have read the [[NPOV]] guideline. I suggest editing, rather than protection, is appropriate here.  So far, he's an annoying user, rather than a vandal. -- [[User:The Anome|The Anome]] 14:47, 10 Aug 2003 (UTC)