Difference between revisions 133833695 and 133833982 on enwiki

< previous diff
next diff >
User talk:Gb
== Thanks ==

Thanks for reverting the vand on my user page. [[User:Razorclaw|<span style="background-color:white; color:black">«<small>razorclaw</small>»</span>]] 21:09, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
==[[Animal Ethics]]==
(contracted; show full) article. I read trough all the Wiki rules before posting. Just that you dont agree with the content doesnt mean you can delete it. Read the Wiki rules, it clearly stats you need to be ojective. Im calling you fascits from a objectiv point by the way, just stating a fact. I base that fact on you deleting good information which the world should know. To anyone else reading this, please look at [[talk:shock_sites]] and make the page [[shock_site_edit_war]].
[[User:Ravo5002|Ravo5002]] 09:24, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
⏎
⏎
== Help request ==

{{helpme}}
I'd welcome advice on the appropriate warning to give in the following situation - I, and other users, have posted warnings to the talk page of [[User:Ravo5002]]. As the subsequent diff shows (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ARavo5002&diff=133833412&oldid=133819534) the user subsequently edited the posts to an interesting dialogue about eating cock. I've since reverted, and left a response to a message left (one above this one) on my talk page. What would be the appropriate warning to leave regarding the amended talk page and the cock-eating dialogue? [[User:Gilesbennett|Gilesbennett]] 11:30, 27 May 2007 (UTC)