Difference between revisions 15422956 and 15422962 on enwiki

{{historical}}

{{Shortcut|[[WP:USSCOTW]]}}
<table align="center" border="0"><tr><td align="center">{{USSCOTW}}</td></tr></table><br />
This is the page to deal with discussion and nominations for the '''U.S. Southern Collaboration of the Week'''. Please sign your votes after contributing; only member votes will be counted. You do not have to be from the South to either submit nominations or vote.

===Nominations===
The next USSCOTW will be picked on SuMonday, November June 27 by which candidate has a higher number of support votes.

If aEach nomination is unsuccessful, it will be kept for a minimum of three weeks unless deterneeds three votes a week. If the nominated by consensus to not have been eligible in the first place.  Any article which does not have eight supports after three weeks will be removed from consideration.  The majority support vote rule stands for picking nominatiarticle receives three votes, the time period for voting is extended for another week and by another three votes. Two weeks' time for six votes, three weeks for nine, and so ons.

[[Wikipedia:U.S. Southern wikipedians' notice board/USSCOTW nominations|Successful and unsuccessful nominations are archived here]]

Please list the nominations below this line.
{{COTWs}}

==Local music in the south==
(contracted; show full)
#[[User:Neutrality|[[User:Neutrality|<b>Neutrality</b>]] ([[User talk:Neutrality|hopefully!]])]] 22:31, Nov 17, 2004 (UTC)
'''Comments:'''
*I proposed this for the main Collaboration of the Week, but it got pruned. Maybe it'll do better here. It certainly deserves more than the current stub. [[User:McMullen|McMullen]] 02:12, 17 Nov 2004 (UTC)
----

[[Category:Weekly Wikipedia collaborations|United States Southern Collaboration of the week]]