Difference between revisions 1556653 and 1828996 on enwiki'''Innovative defenses''' (the invention of which is sometimes called '''''creative lawyering''''') are relatively new and untried [[defense (legal)|defense]]s for having commited a criminal act. Being innovative, there is little or no [[precedent]] bearing upon them. They generally seek to [[justification|justify]] or [[excuse]] the crime, arguing that the [[defendant]] should not be held [[crime|criminally]] [[liability|liable]] for [[action (philosophy)|action]]s which broke the [[law]], rather than argue that they did not commit the given action. In ''[[USA Today]]'' ([[April 12]], [[1995]]), [[David Rosenhan]] was quoted, "We're getting to see some very, very interesting [defenses], and obviously some long shots...There are a terrific number of them." Such defenses include: * the [[abuse defense]] * [[premenstrual stress syndrome]] * the [[biological defense]] (the "Twinkie defense") * "[[black rage]]" * [[urban survival syndrome]]. ''This article is a [[Wikipedia:The perfect stub article|stub]]. You can help Wikipedia by [[Wikipedia:Find or fix a stub|fixing it]].'' All content in the above text box is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license Version 4 and was originally sourced from https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=1828996.
![]() ![]() This site is not affiliated with or endorsed in any way by the Wikimedia Foundation or any of its affiliates. In fact, we fucking despise them.
|