Difference between revisions 16071206 and 58898008 on enwiki

< previous diff
Talk:Alt.talk.creationism
What to do with pages like this one. It clearly (in my mind) does not belong in an encyclopedia, but who defines the limits? Any ideas? --[[User:Snoyes|snoyes]] 01:42 Feb 22, 2003 (UTC)

: Perfectly OK, factually verifiable content. The original version was not NPOV but now it's fine. We have many articles about websites, so why not about newsgroups? Many of those have their own culture. --[[User:Eloquence|Eloquence]] 01:51 Feb 22, 2003 (UTC)

(contracted; show full)

: Because of the reasons I have given. --[[User:Eloquence|Eloquence]]

::Ah.  I didn't realize it was your decision to make unilaterally.  -- [[User:Zoe|Zoe]]

:::Deleting a page, or significant portions thereof, requires consensus (in the Wikipedia "near unanimous" sense). I have expressed strong informed dissent with a removal of the information, this means that it can stay. You can do the same with any page on [[
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|Votes for deletion]]. Feel free to support my proposal to use voting in the Wikipedia decision making process. --[[User:Eloquence|Eloquence]] 05:16 Feb 23, 2003 (UTC)

::::Your choice of words makes it sound as if the decision is entirely yours.  -- [[User:Zoe|Zoe]]

:::::You're reading too much into what I say, Zoe :-). --[[User:Eloquence|Eloquence]]