Difference between revisions 161025573 and 163354110 on enwiki

{{Exonumianotice}}

Reparations cases

I do think the following is relevant:
:The firm has been accused in three CFTC reparations cases: 06-R031, 05-RO38, and 03-R098, according to the NFA. Accusations are not the same as convictions, and the CFTC only releases information on these cases by telephone at (202)418-5508.
(contracted; show full)

Yeah...I checked myself and was unable to substantiate some of them. I will do a checking of facts with all of the awards with the cited publications, and correct...but I should also state that if the awards are written out, then the regulatory actions also deserve more text in the body, and not merely by external link. [[User:The Lonely Trader|The Lonely Trader]] 12:55, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

:What's there to add about regulatory actions? Besides some bad marketing material and an IB gone awry (and I think FXCM was cleared of it.. I don't feel like reading it again), they haven't had any major regulatory actions taken against them. [[User:Lollerskates|Lollerskates]] 16:19, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

=="No Dealing Desk" and changes to FXCM Business Model section==
Does this change FXCM's market maker business model section? Does anyone have any information and citations on this?

Sure , "no dealing desk" is their new trick to make the impression they are having "non-dealing desk" , don't worry they'll keep manipulating their customer's positions to drive them into losses  <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/217.172.19.81|217.172.19.81]] ([[User talk:217.172.19.81|talk]]) 00:29, 29 September 2007 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== from Wikiscanner ==

Wikiscanner shows that this article has been edited 24 times by FXCM, e.g. 
20:57, 3 August 2006 72.5.142.135 (Talk) (undo) 
They also like to edit lots of FX and investment related articles.  Please no COI guys. [[User:Smallbones|Smallbones]] 02:41, 22 August 2007 (UTC)