Difference between revisions 162539587 and 162594582 on enwiki

< previous diff
next diff >
User talk:Neutrality
{{User:Neutrality/talk template}}
==Douglas MacArthur==
The [[Douglas MacArthur]] article received heavy editing today by new/unregistered users, which I noticed at [http://www.wikirage.com WikiRage.com]. According to [http://vs.aka-online.de/wppagehiststat/ Wikipedia Page History Statistics,] you are one of the top Git -R- Done contributors to that page. If you think your efforts to improve that article would be aided if new and unregistered users were blocked from editing that article, please let me know (contracted; show full)ed that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted after  seven days according to our [[WP:CSD#Images/media|Criteria for speedy deletion]]. If you have any questions please ask them at the [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions|Media copyright questions page]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:No fair --> [[User:Calliopejen1|Calliopejen1]] 01:21, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
==[[Hugo Black III]]==
Thanks for the additional info on Mr. Black. [[User:Callelinea|Callelinea]] 21:26, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
⏎
⏎
== TrueOrigin Archive AfD ==

Hi - I was wondering if you might consider rescinding your AfD on [[TrueOrigin Archive]]? It had only been up for '''two minutes''' before you AfD'd it; no one even got a chance to discuss it on the Talk page, there wasn't even time for a {{tl|notability}} tag or a {{tl|NPOV}} tag or an '''ANYTHING''' tag, so that it might be resolved in Talk. As it is, the AfD page has now become the article's Talk page, and the discussion is centering on why this was done after two minutes instead of giving it enough time to be discussed on the Talk page.

I'm not saying the article ''shouldn't'' be deleted. Maybe it should, if there's consensus for that. But shouldn't WP editors be given the chance to ''work'' on the article first?

Thanks for your time. --[[User:Profg|profg]] 03:21, 6 October 2007 (UTC)