Difference between revisions 16285602 and 55534068 on enwiki

< previous diff
Talk:Brianism/VfD Jan 2004
==From VfD==

* [[Brianism]] - nonsense, exists only in this article and on the website cited. -- [[User:The Anome|The Anome]] 18:48, 11 Jan 2004 (UTC)
** No vote, FYI: Our [[Google|God]] says 92 hits for "Brianism". A number of these hits come from Wikipedia and sites that use Wikipedia as a source. [[User:Optim|Optim]] 20:39, 11 Jan 2004 (UTC)
(contracted; show full)
**No evidence that it exists 'in the wild'.  Delete as vanity. [[User:Salsa Shark|Salsa Shark]] 23:54, 12 Jan 2004 (UTC)
**Keep. This is just the sort of BS I like to see. Needs editing for NPOV and accuracy of course. [[Wiki
pedia:What Wikipedia is not|Wiki is not paper]] [[User:JackLynch|Jack]] 09:38, 13 Jan 2004 (UTC)
--------------------------

Anjouli, I'm just seeking evidence, as any good skeptic would.
* Point one: "For some years, Brianists have been lobbying the skeptic movement to adopt the term bright instead of skeptic or debunker." You appear to be claiming that the "Brianist movement" is behind the use of the term "Brights"?  Evidence please?
(contracted; show full)

Keep. It seems to exist, even though it appears to be denying it's belief system in an effort to get the article removed from here. [[User:JamesDay|Jamesday]] 16:32, 20 Jan 2004 (UTC)
-----
Delete. Nothing wrong with parody religion but unless Brianism has gained a proven, big popularity the article doesn't belong in wikepdia. Wikepedia should not be a place for internet jokes or to advertise personal hobbies.
[[User:Andries|Andries]] 

------