Difference between revisions 209617670 and 209617875 on enwiki

< previous diff
next diff >
Talk:Group hug
[[Grouphug.us]] was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. Further comments should be made below the archived discussion rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was NO CONSENSUS TO DELETE

(contracted; show full)y first post so plz excuse any mistypings... but uh, On the topic of legality, i mean, there is a major difference between a police report and grouphug.us. In a police report, it states crimes that have been committed and the people needing capture or those caught. In grouphug.us, you can find people making threats on a life, that is crimes that are to come, whether its people saying it about themselves, family, schools, or presidents. So yeah, just wanted to mention that, but i still think it should stay.
  <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/76.202.12.2|76.202.12.2]] ([[User talk:76.202.12.2|talk]]) 03:06, 2 May 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== "NN" ==

The website is notable. It has received massive press coverage, receives millions of hits, and the author has published an anthology of its contents to much acclaim. Why is this template on the article header? I removed it, but "[[User:Haakon|Haakon]]" reinserted it. It also [http://www.alexa.com/data/details/main?q=&url=grouphug.us receives 35 million views per week], on average, and is the source of much controversy. If that isn't enough for inclusion I don'(contracted; show full)

== Controversy? ==

Is there a template on wikipedia stating that the article has been controversial?  <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/125.236.191.25|125.236.191.25]] ([[User talk:125.236.191.25|talk]]) 04:16, 26 March 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->