Difference between revisions 252919207 and 252919755 on enwiki

==Al Odah v. United States==
{{PAGENAME}} was among the eleven detainees covered in the July 2008 "Petitioners' Status Report" filed by [[David J. Cynamon]] in ''[[Al Odah, v. United States]]'' on behalf of the four remaining Kuwaiti captives in Guantanamo. Seven other prisoners were [[amalgamate]]d to the case, which charged that none of the men had been cleared for release. even though the government had completed "factual returns" for them -- and those factual returns had contained redacted sections.<ref name=Cv08-0442Doc88>
{{cite web
| url=http://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/district-of-columbia/dcdce/1:2008mc00442/131990/88/0.pdf
|format=PDF| title=Guantanamo Bay Detainee Litigation: Doc 88 -- petitioners' status report
| publisher=[[United States Department of Justice]]
| author=[[David J. Cynamon]]
| date=2008-08-19
| accessdate=2008-08-23
| quote=
}} [http://www.webcitation.org/query?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdocs.justia.com%2Fcases%2Ffederal%2Fdistrict-courts%2Fdistrict-of-columbia%2Fdcdce%2F1%3A2008mc00442%2F131990%2F88%2F0.pdf&date=2008-08-22 mirror]
</ref>

The decision, striking down the Military Commissions Act, was handed down on [[12 June]] [[2008]].<ref name=NYT>[http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/13/washington/12cnd-gitmo.html?_r=1&hp&oref=slogin Justices Rule Terror Suspects Can Appeal in Civilian Courts]</ref><ref>[http://www.supremecourtus.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/06-1195.pdf Transcript of Supreme Court oral arguments for Boumediene v. Bush (No. 06-1195) and Al Odah v. US (06-1196)]</ref>⏎
⏎
<noinclude>
----
These templates exist per agreement by all who took part in discussions at Wikiproject:Templates, Wikiproject:Terrorism and Wikipedia Talk:Templates. Their existence is justified in that they are slowly being used to pipe sections of debated NPOV/COATRACK issues across as many as 900 separate articles dealing with Guantanamo captives.
[[Category:Guantanamo detainee templates]]
</noinclude>