Difference between revisions 26823145 and 55532059 on enwiki

In order to remain listed at [[Wikipedia:Requests for comment]], at least two people need to show that they tried to resolve a dispute with this user and have failed. This must involve the ''same'' dispute, not different disputes. The persons complaining must provide evidence of their efforts, and each of them must certify it by signing this page with <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>. If this does not happen within 48 hours of the creation of this dispute page (which was: {insert UTC ti(contracted; show full)

==Response==
''This is a summary written by the user whose conduct is disputed, or by other users who think that the dispute is unjustified and that the above summary is biased or incomplete.'' 

First of all, I would like to point out the fact that [[User:Luigi30|Luigi30]] wasn't an innocent bystander, he lied about his [[
Wikipedia:WikiMoney|WikiMoney]] amount, because [[User:Silsor|silsor]] took &psi; 20 from his already "empty" account. This obviously makes him guilty of [[tax evasion]]. While the above doesn't excuse [[User:Silsor|silsor]], it demonstrate that [[User:Luigi30|Luigi30]] is not as innocent as some people want us to believe.

Secondly, eIf you will  watch the recording closely, you'll notice he never threatened anyone, he just said ''This is a holdup! Get down on the floor and nobody gets hurt!'' whose first part can be interpreted as ''this is a delay!''. While it may seem far fetched, it could be related to the slowness Wikipedia has been experiencing lately. Therefore, the fact that they all handed him their [[Wikipedia:WikiMoney|WikiMoney]] cannot be interpreted as a [[robbery]] and invalidates the evidence of trying to resolve the dispute. [[User:Gcbirzan|gcbirzan]] ([[User_talk:Gcbirzan|talk]]) 12:00, 13 Jan 2005 (UTC) 

Users who endorse this summary (sign with <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>):

# [[User:Gcbirzan|gcbirzan]] ([[User_talk:Gcbirzan|talk]]) 12:00, 13 Jan 2005 (UTC) You know, everybody keeps talking about this as it's already been established that [[User:Silsor|silsor]] is guilty, even before the trial! Oh, and, yes, he did beat up [[User:Luigi30|Luigi30]], but he had it coming for being guilty! Also, out of the four people that support this, two didn't even have [[Wikipedia:WikiMoney|WikiMoney]] at the time, one didn't use it and only one is genuinely interested in the matter. What is the other three's interest in accusing [[User:Silsor|silsor]] and jumping on the false evidence presented here? Because of the above, and because I don't see anyone asking for their [[WikiMoney|money]] back, I believe that [[User:Silsor|silsor]] was framed, and that he is, in fact, innocent!
(contracted; show full)mbers deserves the most terrible punishment. "One through nine, no maybes, no supposes, no fractions. You can't travel in space, you can't go out into space, you know, without, like, you know, with fractions. What are you going to land on? One-quarter, three-eighths? What are you going to do when you go from here to Venus or something? That's dialectic physics."
#Endorse wholeheartedly - [[User:David Gerard|David Gerard]] 05:51, 15 Jan 2005 (UTC)
#Kewl! I gotta get me one of dem [[
Wikipedia:WikiMoney|WikiMoney]] accounts. I'll be rich! WikiRich I tells ya! Then I'll buy this Internet thingy and rule the whole stinking world!!!!1!! --[[User:Deathphoenix|Death]][[User_talk:Deathphoenix|'''phoenix''']] 05:55, 24 Jan 2005 (UTC)
(contracted; show full)
#Endorse wholeheartedly - [[User:David Gerard|David Gerard]] 05:51, 15 Jan 2005 (UTC)


===Coolcat===
No silsor is innocent. Suspect had a pink T-shirt and vanished in the crowd northbound. --[[User:Coolcat|Cool Cat]] [[User talk:Coolcat|<sup>My Talk</sup>]] 18:10, 25 July 2005 (UTC)

==Discussion==
''All'' signed comments and talk not related to a vote or endorsement, should be directed to [[Wikipedia talk:{{PAGENAME}}|this page's discussion page]].