Difference between revisions 34975 and 34977 on enwiki

Some stuff by 24.150.61.63 which still needs checking (I'm reluctant to just delete everything, although (s)he's adding stuff so fast there may be no alternative):

*[[Bonobo]]
*[[Eco-villages]]
*[[Evolution of societies]]
*[[Four Pillars of the Green Party]]
*[[Great ape]]
*[[Greens]]
(contracted; show full)

That's going to make me sound like a Green.  But that's also what makes a scientist sound like a scientist.

I'd just ask you to look at your own motivations, and why something like Four_Pillars you consider so objectionable in its edited form, while Electoral_Reform is not. 
  
⏎

⏎
:My listing an article here doesn't mean that I object to it. It just means that the article needs to be checked. [[Electoral Reform]] is not listed because I hadn't even noticed it. (However, I'm not going to add it now, because it looks like 64.26.98.xxx and 213.253.39.xxx have dealt with it. You could try doing something useful by moving it to [[Electoral reform]], which is where it should be.) --[[user:Zundark|Zundark]], 2002 Mar 22

I'm sure you don't want me digging through every entry to find ideological points of view that don't reflect modern scientific ideas of body and ecology, so we have to find some middle ground here somewhere.

Biosafety has three definitions:  one in agriculture, one in medicine, and one in trade.  I can't explain the three meanings without some attempt at unifying them, and I can't unify them without some reference to ecology and the body.  That's going to make me sound like a Green, because only Greens can do this... unfortunately.  Biosafety and biosecurity don't make sense if your brain is addled by ideology.  They make perfect sense if you view your self as body wandering around in an ecology.