Difference between revisions 37194 and 37218 on enwiki

Welcome to Wikipedia! May I call you "24" for short? [[Ed Poor]]
----
Some stuff by 24.150.61.63 which still needs checking (I'm reluctant to just delete everything, although (s)he's adding stuff so fast there may be no alternative):

*[[Blue-Green Alliance]]
*[[Bonobo]]
*[[Conservation movement]]
*[[Eco-villages]]
(contracted; show full)

I'd like to help you get to 100,000 articles, hell I could write 10,000 myself, but first you have to trust that I'm at least more right than wrong, and that the way I write these things will bring in more expert helpers than just leaving them blank or incompletely defined.
----


⏎

⏎
Maybe it's just me, but i think i don't like 24, his attitude to wikipedia and way of writing (for example in his revision of [[NPOV]]).  [[user:szopen|szopen]]
⏎

⏎
----
I did that fairly early on, in response to some outright censorship - some of which is documented above.  Last I saw it was reversed.  It's not at all clear what is the central arbiter of policy here, since there's no single editor.  I'd appreciate a discussion of that.

I don't give a damn who likes me, my writing, or my attitude.  However, I am here to cooperate, and there's no point denying that one of the things that I'm here to change is the idea that NPOV always means compromise with socially prevalent errors.

I can prove to the satisfaction of any expert that "natural point of view" and "neutral point of view" are not the same thing.  The baby brother of these arguments is the ones about Eurocentrism, the middle brother is the arguments about dominator culture and mathematics, adn the big brother argument is that someone always knows what's "Natural" better than you do.

So, every new entry to wikipedia is going to change its political and ethical tone.  That's life.

So, you don't like me, and maybe I don't like you.  Fine.  For this to work, you'd have to say *why*, or how you think my work biases wikipedia.

Go ahead.  The floor is yours.

-----