Difference between revisions 55298724 and 55298963 on enwiki

< previous diff
next diff >
User talk:Nikitchenko/Stollery
== Have you even bothered to read the warnings?! What is your problem with me? ==

# The warnings were for "removing content from Wikipedia" - I wasn't even removing content I was '''adding''' a AfD template! 
# Wikipedia [[Wikipedia:Talk_page|policy states]]: ''"It is generally acceptable to remove misplaced vandalism tags, as long as the reasoning is solid."'' 
(contracted; show full)1&oldid=47979478] Stollery vandalizes[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ANikitchenko&diff=55050285&oldid=55050157] my talk page after I already warned him to use the mediation page for contacting me. I warned him not to vandalize my page and reminded him to use the mediation page and he left another uncivil comment[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ANikitchenko&diff=55050566&oldid=55050422] --[[User:Nikitchenko|Nikitchenko]] 10:18, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
⏎
⏎
== Mediation Cabal: gathering evidence ==

I'm busy right now documenting things about the disputes. I am beginning to think the problem isn't only over my dispute at the OSA article.  There seems to be evidence about Stollery's behavior that need to be looked at. --[[User:Nikitchenko|Nikitchenko]] 10:30, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

::Now you are [[wikistalking]] both Stollery and myself.  You have certified the basis for a dispute in an RFC about the Jack Hyles related articles -- a topic for which you have absolutely reason for even thinking about.  The sole reason that you even commented at all is because you wish to spite me.  That is very petty and inappropriate behavior.  [[User:Vivaldi|Vivaldi]] ([[User talk:Vivaldi|talk]]) 14:14, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

#21 May 2006 [[Charlie Sheen]] - Stollery removes allegations backed by reliable source[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Charlie_Sheen&diff=prev&oldid=54346617] but insists allegations by unreliable source remain in his "enemies" article[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AOffice_of_Special_Affairs&diff=52942175&oldid=52858377]. --[[User:Nikitchenko|Nikitchenko]] 10:28, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
#18 May 2006 [[User:WiseOne]] Why does Stollery redirect another user's page: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:WiseOne&diff=prev&oldid=53787253] ? --[[User:Nikitchenko|Nikitchenko]] 10:50, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
#17 May 2006 [[Talk:Michael Jackson]] Stollery's POV: "It is not appropriate that the opening few lines insult the subject of the article"[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Michael_Jackson&diff=prev&oldid=53704524] --[[User:Nikitchenko|Nikitchenko]] 10:53, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
#11 May 2006 [[Scientology versus the Internet]] Vanity or spam link? : Stollery Wikilinks his own website from an article.[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Scientology_versus_the_Internet&diff=prev&oldid=52607726] --[[User:Nikitchenko|Nikitchenko]] 11:14, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
#27 December 2005 [[ScienTOMogy]] Stollery promotes his website with '''m''' to indicate a minor edit.[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=ScienTOMogy&diff=prev&oldid=32859032] --[[User:Nikitchenko|Nikitchenko]] 11:45, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
#27 December 2005 [[Jumping the couch]] Stollery promotes his website[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jumping_the_couch&diff=prev&oldid=32858056] --[[User:Nikitchenko|Nikitchenko]] 11:45, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
#9 December 2005 [[User talk:69.10.96.4]] Stollery reveals the identity (real name) of what he thinks[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:69.10.96.4&diff=prev&oldid=30697079] is the user of an IP address. If I remember correct this is against Wikipedia rules. --[[User:Nikitchenko|Nikitchenko]] 11:33, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
#9 December 2005 [[ List of Scientologists]] Stollery linkspams his vanity article [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_Scientologists&diff=prev&oldid=30694403] --[[User:Nikitchenko|Nikitchenko]] 11:28, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
#9 December 2005 [[Scientology and the legal system]] Stollery linkspams his vanity article[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Scientology_and_the_legal_system&diff=prev&oldid=30693543] --[[User:Nikitchenko|Nikitchenko]] 11:28, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

lol!!! - '''''[[User:Stollery|Gl]][[User:Stollery/Esperanza|<font color="green">e</font>]][[User:Stollery|<font color="red">n</font>]]''''' ''<small><sup>[[User_talk:Stollery|T]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Stollery|C]]</sub> [[User:Stollery|(Stollery)]]</small>'' 11:18, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

don't vandalize my talk page Stollery.  If you have something to say put it in the mediation page. Communication between us has already failed too many times. --[[User:Nikitchenko|Nikitchenko]] 11:20, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

:Ok, why don't you? Oh yeah, you're blocked... again! - '''''[[User:Stollery|Gl]][[User:Stollery/Esperanza|<font color="green">e</font>]][[User:Stollery|<font color="red">n</font>]]''''' ''<small><sup>[[User_talk:Stollery|T]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Stollery|C]]</sub> [[User:Stollery|(Stollery)]]</small>'' 11:22, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

I've only begun my search and already found problems with Stollery. Who knows what I'll find as I continue through his history :) Best way to spend my free time while being blocked! --[[User:Nikitchenko|Nikitchenko]] 11:30, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

Stollery vandalizes my talk page (harrassment) and presents uncivil attitude towards me, 20 minutes go by with no activity from Stollery and then he goes to Jimbo wales page to do this:[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Jimbo_Wales&diff=prev&oldid=55052103]. Hmmm. :) --[[User:Nikitchenko|Nikitchenko]] 11:51, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

Interesting that Stollery has special links in his user page to monitor me and Terryeo.  Probably because we're scientologists. --[[User:Nikitchenko|Nikitchenko]] 11:51, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

:I can answer your second question after careful and thorough research (i.e. reading the edit summary of the diff you linked to). Glen accidentally posted a warning on a user's userpage instead of his talk page, and moved the userpage to his talkpage with the 'move' button rather than doing a cut and paste. That created the redirect. --[[User:Samuel Blanning|Sam Blanning]]<sup>[[User talk:Samuel Blanning|(talk)]]</sup> 13:53, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

:''Probably because we're scientologists.''  Probably because you both push your POV in ways that are strictly and expressly prohibited by Wikipedia policy and repeatedly insist that you don't comprehend how Wikipedia policy actually works so that you can claim that you're "acting in good faith" when you violate the rules.  I mean, look at the current mediation case which only exists because you ''still'' purport to believe that the {{tl|dubious}} tag exists for you, a Wikipedia editor, to communicate to the reader your personal judgements about whose statements you believe.  That case has been going on for a month and a half and you're still trying to assert that you don't comprehend the policy that is the fundamental basis of the case. -- [[User:Antaeus Feldspar|Antaeus Feldspar]] 14:37, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

::More Uncivil communication from Antaeus. Antaeus doesn't provide any evidence that "push my POV" and his opinin that I am "trying to assert that <nowiki>[I]</nowiki> don't comprehend the policy" is also incorrect. I don't like the way Antaeus tries to make his opinion as if he is an authority. I only dispute the reliability of Tory as a source. --[[User:Nikitchenko|Nikitchenko]] 18:37, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

Thank you Sam and Antaeus. I'll comment on the preposterously ludicrous allegations made by Jimmy, oops sorry UNK, oops sorry, I mean; "Joschka":

#Read your claims again: ''"Stollery removes allegations backed by reliable source but insists allegations by unreliable source remain in his "enemies" article"'' - seriously mate, the '''question''' (note question - not claim nor allegation - QUESTION) has to be asked are you on drugs?! Where did I claim:<br>'''a)''' that the source was unreliable or <br>'''b)''' claim allegations remain in my '''ENEMIES''' article?!<br>Did you read the article's [[Talk:Charlie_Sheen|discussion page?]] Did you read through [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Charlie_Sheen&action=history the history?] Did you conduct ANY research before making these unfounded, completely false and defamatory allegations?! The answer: '''AN ABSOLUTE AND UNEQUIVOCAL NO'''. The parts removed from the article were removed '''BY CONSENSUS''' (which is why they haven't been reverted) because they are simple allegations and do not deserve to be in an article as if stated as fact. My suggestion would be that perhaps anyone making these claims should maybe learn to read, or word clear their vocab, (no allegations made) huh??
#Read Sam's answer above. Yes after his exhaustive "research" he managed to determine the exact reason as to why the change was made. Perhaps anyone making these claims should learn to utilize a brain cell or two? (no allegations make)
#'''''DID YOU EVEN READ THE PAGE???''''' Here, try again:<br>[[Image:mikejack.jpg]]<br>You see Jimmy, this is a talk page - for DISCUSSION. I am not pushing my POV, rather putting it up FOR DISCUSSION. Perhaps anyone making these claims should learn to grasp these BASIC concepts before commenting okay??? (no allegations made)
#How can it be a ''spam link'' when it is not an external link at all but rather a wikilink to another wikipedia article about a related scientology vs. the internet article? If it was spam why has it not been reverted? Anyone making these claims to discredit me equates to be somewhat laughable... is the seriously the best you could do?
#Again. Anyone making these claims is truly pathetic (no allegations made). This is again an '''''entirely appropriate link''''' to a news source with an article totally related to the article in question. If this is the best you can do then I'm a happy man. SIX MONTHS LATER AN NOBODY HAS REVERTED THE LINK? Why is only you that has a problem with this buddy boy???
#Have you even looked at this article??? What does the opening paragraphs say?<br><blockquote>''When Cruise engaged in some sofa stomping, he coined a new phrase called '''jumping the couch''' - the defining moment when someone has gone of the deep end.''</blockquote>How is that unrelated to an article on "jumping the couch''? I know English isn't your first language but SERIOUSLY!! (no allegations made)
#Actually Paul's a good friend of mine and again, your attempts to discredit me are a testimony to your отсутсвие сведении (никакие заявления не сделали)
#See 4 and 5 above
#And again. Try again my friend... this was comical at best.
- '''''[[User:Stollery|Gl]][[User:Stollery/Esperanza|<font color="green">e</font>]][[User:Stollery|<font color="red">n</font>]]''''' ''<small><sup>[[User_talk:Stollery|T]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Stollery|C]]</sub> [[User:Stollery|(Stollery)]]</small>'' 16:22, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

:Stollery includes '''incivility''' with his rebuttal. --[[User:Nikitchenko|Nikitchenko]] 18:37, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

===Response to Stollery===
#''"Stollery removes allegations backed by reliable source but insists allegations by unreliable source remain in his "enemies" article"'' Stollery answered with incivility and ask me where he claimed the source was unreliable, I never wrote that Stollery claimed they are unreliable. I only say he removed claims provided with a reliable source[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Charlie_Sheen&diff=prev&oldid=54346617]
#He can revert, instead of redirecting other users pages.
#Stollery's POV: "It is not appropriate that the opening few lines insult the subject of the article"[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Michael_Jackson&diff=prev&oldid=53704524]
#Stollery Wikilinks his own website from an article.[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Scientology_versus_the_Internet&diff=prev&oldid=52607726].  Stollery's includes "Anyone making these claims to discredit me equates to be somewhat laughable... is the seriously the best you could do?" in his response. Incivility.  And he claims to be an Esperanza member.
#Stollery promotes his website's article with '''m''' to indicate a minor edit.[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=ScienTOMogy&diff=prev&oldid=32859032] His response included: "Anyone making these claims is truly pathetic (no allegations made)." More incivility from an user who claim he is Esperanza.
#Stollery promotes his website[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jumping_the_couch&diff=prev&oldid=32858056]. His edit was to an article about his website. Stollery response includes "I know English isn't your first language but SERIOUSLY!! (no allegations made)". More incivility from a user to says he is Esperanze.
#I don't know that person is a good friend of Stollery...
#Stollery linkspams his vanity article [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_Scientologists&diff=prev&oldid=30694403] his response is to refer me to his incivil responses.
#Stollery linkspams his vanity article[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Scientology_and_the_legal_system&diff=prev&oldid=30693543]. His response "try again" and calls me a friend but he does not treat me like friends but with incivility and drag me into revert wars.
:--[[User:Nikitchenko|Nikitchenko]] 18:49, 26 May 2006 (UTC)