Difference between revisions 60489829 and 60504337 on enwikiCheers, Let me know your concerns here, before nominating this article for deletion. I am eager to contribute to Wikipedia and have spent some time writing and polishing this article. If there is something you don't agree with, you're welcome to improve it, or discuss the improvements with me, I'm very flexible. But please do not nominate the article for deletion before discussing it here. Thank you, [[User:Pete8|Pete8]] 00:01, 22 June 2006 (UTC) (contracted; show full)rve. As reference, I suggest everyone interested in Peter's proposal read the following report that came out of Fox 31 in Denver. http://www.fox31news.com/_ezpost/data/6465.shtml Accurate or not, there's certainly no concensus in Forex trading circles that 4xMadeEasy is an authority in Forex trading. The same goes for everyone else. Until one is appointed head of the Federal Reserve, everyone would better be served getting their testimonials from somewhere else. [[User:Ezgoing85018|Ezgoing85018]] ⏎ ⏎ == Why not just an article on James Dicks? == The Forex teaching is just a scam - according to 2 news reports - so why not delete the "Forex teachers" article take out the bottom 2 guys, and just include the documented material on Dicks under an article "James Dicks"? [[User:Smallbones|Smallbones]] 16:20, 25 June 2006 (UTC) All content in the above text box is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license Version 4 and was originally sourced from https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=60504337.
![]() ![]() This site is not affiliated with or endorsed in any way by the Wikimedia Foundation or any of its affiliates. In fact, we fucking despise them.
|