Difference between revisions 623279982 and 623400248 on enwiki

< previous diff
next diff >
Talk:Group hug
{{WikiProject Websites}}

== Conflicting info ==

Was grouphug.us launched in October 2009 as the article says or in September 30, 2003 as the info box says? [[User:Rovanion|Rovanion]] ([[User talk:Rovanion|talk]]) 14:22, 26 May 2011 (UTC)

== Deletion ==
<div class="boilerplate discussion-archived" style="background-color: #f5f3ef; overflow:auto; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #aaa">
:''The following discussion is closed. {{red|'''Please do not modify it.'''}} Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.''  <!-- from Template:discussion top-->⏎
⏎
[[Grouphug.us]] was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. Further comments should be made below the archived discussion rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was NO CONSENSUS TO DELETE

(contracted; show full)
*'''Keep'''. This site made some headlines and resulted in a book publication. As it's gone now, it's important to have a record of its impact. --[[User:Sumdog|Sumdog]] ([[User talk:Sumdog|talk]]) 02:56, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

''End archived discussion'' -- [[User:Francs2000|Graham  &#9786;]] | [[User talk:Francs2000|Talk]] 02:10, 15 Nov 2004 (UTC)


----
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.''<!-- from Template:discussion bottom --></div>⏎
⏎
⏎
== Legality ==

Have the owners of grouphug.us ever, uh, gotten in trouble with the law? The stuff that's posted on that site, while hilarious, is some of the most horrific shit you could ever lay eyes on. I mean many people on there are basically making public things that are downright illegal. I'd be amazed if nobody has threatened to have this site removed before.

(contracted; show full)27;'', but suggest that "Group hug" be turned either into a stub article or into a definition loaded disambiguation page.  [http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/group-hug "Group hug"] has its own definition in Oxford dictionaries and gets [https://www.google.co.uk/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&ion=1&espv=2&ie=UTF-8#q=%22group+hug%22 About 811,000 results] on Google. [[User:Gregkaye|Gregkaye]] ([[User talk:Gregkaye|talk]]) 07:25, 29 August 2014 (UTC)