Difference between revisions 62836002 and 62856234 on enwiki

{{Template:Blp}}
What's the deal with the bizarro picture?  It looks like a last-known-photo type photo. And this is the one that she herself uploaded to wikipedia? This isn't MySpace...There has to be a better one to use that shows the subject of the article more clearly.
[[User:Shamrox|Shamrox]] 16:25, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

(contracted; show full)*[[Wikipedia:Autobiography]]
*[[Wikipedia:Vanity]]
*[[WP:NOT#Wikipedia_is_not_a_soapbox]], 2. Self Promotion
*[[Wikipedia:Deletion_policy]]

*http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Notable_Wikipedian

I am waiting for response here, but I think the "Deletion without justifying" policy might be appropriate for the next reversion of Dash10's last May 5 version revert.[[User:Steven Russell|Steven Russell]] 05:17, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
⏎
⏎
⏎
RESPONSE


I am Fermico2.

Kola Boof herself has contacted Wikipedia Administrators and they agreed with her about your changes.

1--You do not have permission to use the COPYRIGHT-PROTECTED cover of "Nile River Woman" in her article. That is infringement and Wikipedia left you a message informing you of that last time. Neither Boof nor her publisher wants that photos used. 
2--Ms. Boof wants as little written about Osama Bin Laden in the article as possible. Only that she was involved with him against her will. She detests and was greatly disgusted by your focus on something that does not represent who she is or what her work is about, not to mention, her life and her children's lives have been in danger because of her association with that man. 



3--It is clear that you, like so many, are an enemy of this woman and have no interest in her work or what she's about, but would rather carry on speculation about "gossipy" issues in her life, and naturally, the author doesn't like what you are posting and doesn't want to be represented that way. 
FERMICO2

ALSO NOTE that Wikipedia felt your article was TOO LONG and preferred the streamlined "to the point" article that Kola Boof feels represents what she is about and what her life is about.

Wikipedia agrees that she should have a great deal of say in what is written on this site about her, since it's HER LIFE being portrayed.

Your article doesn't portray her life, but is a veiled attack.

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Dash10"