Difference between revisions 693856 and 693866 on enwiki

< previous diff
next diff >
Talk:Alt.talk.creationism
What to do with pages like this one. It clearly (in my mind) does not belong in an encyclopedia, but who defines the limits? Any ideas? --[[User:Snoyes|snoyes]] 01:42 Feb 22, 2003 (UTC)

: Perfectly OK, factually verifiable content. The original version was not NPOV but now it's fine. We have many articles about websites, so why not about newsgroups? Many of those have their own culture. --[[User:Eloquence|Eloquence]] 01:51 Feb 22, 2003 (UTC)

(contracted; show full)

::I think that's the point of the [[list of newsgroups]], yes. -- [[User:Modemac|Modemac]] 02:20 Feb 22, 2003 (UTC)


What purpose does the list of participants (with only one name) accomplish?  I don't think it should be here -- it's not like these people would have their own articles on the 'pedia.  -- [[User:Zoe|Zoe]]

⏎

⏎
: No comment on having/not having a list. (Because I have no particular opinion either way.) But as a general rule, any list with only one person on it has to be highly suspect. [[User:Tannin|Tannin]]