Difference between revisions 693870 and 693910 on enwiki

< previous diff
next diff >
Talk:Alt.talk.creationism
What to do with pages like this one. It clearly (in my mind) does not belong in an encyclopedia, but who defines the limits? Any ideas? --[[User:Snoyes|snoyes]] 01:42 Feb 22, 2003 (UTC)

: Perfectly OK, factually verifiable content. The original version was not NPOV but now it's fine. We have many articles about websites, so why not about newsgroups? Many of those have their own culture. --[[User:Eloquence|Eloquence]] 01:51 Feb 22, 2003 (UTC)

(contracted; show full)nd verifiable (just do a search on groups.google.com). The argument that the people in this list would probably not get their own articles doesn't count: The same is true for many other lists. It is, however, possible that some people eventually ''will'' get their own articles, there are certainly "Usenet celebrities", e.g. [[Kibo]]. 

: I hope that Snowbird will expand the list. But for the time being it can stay. --[[User:Eloquence|Eloquence]] 04:48 Feb 23, 2003 (UTC)

⏎

⏎
"It can stay"?  Why, because Eloquence has spoken? -- [[User:Zoe|Zoe]]