Difference between revisions 77006093 and 77529383 on enwiki

{{Oldafdfull|date=June 19, 2006|result='''Keep'''|votepage=James Dicks}}

This is the same info, I've put into the self-promoting [[forex teachers]] article.
I believe it should be put here and that that article should be deleted.

[[User:Smallbones|Smallbones]] 17:27, 25 June 2006 (UTC)

(contracted; show full)
::ditto for the $1000 (total) mud volleyball tournament and the toys-for-tots contribution.[[User:Smallbones|Smallbones]]

Quoting individuals who have a beef with him or his company are facts?  If this is going to be put in then James should be able to respond with quotes of his own, which then makes it self promoting and a discussion forum, not a fact based page.  And the fraud category is a personal opinion, again not fact.
⏎
⏎
:Correction - the article quotes multiple reliable sources (Fox TV in Denver, MarketWatch, the Houston Press).  The article is factual in that it is fact that these sources published the quoted statements.  The reader can judge for himself whether he believes the sources.  This level of reliability is required by Wikipedia rules.  Please note that most of the accomplishments section does not meet these standards for reliability!  (even the mud volleyball stuff).  I don't know about the rule for applying categories, but I'd imagine that applying any categorization involves some interpretation of the facts as presented.  Since a bit of interpretation is necessary, I don't think that you can complain about this unless you want to outlaw categorization altogether.  [[User:Smallbones|Smallbones]] 13:13, 24 September 2006 (UTC)