Difference between revisions 783304 and 3012256 on enwikiThe '''Wigner - d'Espagnat inequality''' is a basic result of [[Set theory]]. It is named for [[Eugene Wigner]] and Bertrand d'Espagnat who (as pointed out by [[John Stewart Bell|Bell]]) both employed it in their popularizations of [[quantum mechanics]]. Given a set S with three subsets, J, K, and L, the following holds: * each member of S which is a member of J, but not of L :: is either a member of J, but neither of K, nor of L, (contracted; show full) Instead, they had to be derived in three distinct sets of trials, separately and pairwise by A and B, by A and C, and by B and C, respectively. The failure of certain measurements (such as the non-negative ratios in the example) to be obtained at once, together from one and the same set of trials, and thus their failure to satisfy Wigner - d'Espagnat inequalities, has been characterized as constituting disproof of [[ Albert Einstein|Einstein]]'s notion of ''local realism''. Similar interdependencies between ''two'' particular measurements and the corresponding operators are the [[Robertson - Schrödinger relationUncertainty Principle|Uncertainty relations]] as first expressed by [[Werner Heisenberg|Heisenberg]] for the interdependence between measurements of distance and of momentum, and as generalized by [[Edward Condon]], [[Howard Percy Robertson]], and [[Erwin Schrödinger]]. ====Reference==== * John S. Bell, ''Bertlmann's socks and the nature of reality'', Journal de Physique '''42''', no. 3, p. 41 (1981); and references therein. All content in the above text box is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license Version 4 and was originally sourced from https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=3012256.
![]() ![]() This site is not affiliated with or endorsed in any way by the Wikimedia Foundation or any of its affiliates. In fact, we fucking despise them.
|