Difference between revisions 7838837 and 7852564 on enwiki

<center>{{pic of the day}}</center>
<div style="background-color: #f0f0ff; border: 1px solid #333 ; padding: 5px; width: 220px;">'''Archives [[User talk:Neutrality/Archive 1|1]]''', '''[[User talk:Neutrality/Archive 2|2]]''', '''[[User talk:Neutrality/Archive 3|3]]''', '''[[User talk:Neutrality/Archive 4|4]]''', '''[[User talk:Neutrality/Archive 5(contracted; show full)
:<nowiki>{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}</nowiki>

Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain (which many people do or don't like to do, see [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing]]), you could replace '''<nowiki>{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}</nowiki>''' with '''<nowiki>{{MultiLicensePD}}</nowiki>''' -- [[User:Ram-Man|Ram-Man]] 21:56, Nov 24, 2004 (UTC)
⏎
⏎
==Election article titles==
How to title the articles on this subject, and how to present the subject matter (which topics go in which article), was the subject of a lot of discussion on different talk pages.  There was a consensus to have one article about the controversy generally, without reference in its title to "irregularities".  To the people doing a lot of work on the points about exit polls and EVM's, that word suggested a focus on the statistical analysis.  As a result, it was a problem to present a more general article.

I don't care too much about the title of the really long article.  Different parts of it have already been copied to new articles, and I think that, before long, that huge article (the one now at [[2004 U.S. presidential election controversy and irregularities]]) will be turned into a redirect, because other articles will have absorbed all its material.  But I think it's very important that the overview article, which you moved to [[2004 U.S. election voting controversy and irregularities]], be moved back to [[2004 U.S. election voting controversies]].  The other articles can handle the "irregularity" analysis.   [[User:JamesMLane|JamesMLane]] 06:32, 25 Nov 2004 (UTC)