Difference between revisions 79485022 and 79820768 on enwiki

{{Oldafdfull|date=June 19, 2006|result='''Keep'''|votepage=James Dicks}}

This is the same info, I've put into the self-promoting [[forex teachers]] article.
I believe it should be put here and that that article should be deleted.

[[User:Smallbones|Smallbones]] 17:27, 25 June 2006 (UTC)

(contracted; show full)

:On the other hand, just listing advertising puffery and self-promotion are definitely not allowed.  [[User:Smallbones|Smallbones]] 10:06, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

== Deprod ==

I removed the delete in 5 days notice that was put up supposedly because there is not any sources or documentation in the article.  There were lots of sources, now there are more.  I'll try to tidy things up and use the right format.  [[User:Smallbones|Smallbones]] 12:32, 30 September 2006 (UTC)


:Who do I speak with when there is a violation of the terms of Wikipedia?  Easy with the fraudster claims and the "reliable" sources you are getting, which in fact are 2 sources.  That makes it a fact?  Replublishing articles written by individuals does not make them fact.  Is Wikiepdia fact based or heresay?  I suggest we agree to delete this entry from Wikipedia.⏎
⏎
::I'll ask some 3rd parties to explain to you how to properly list an article for deletion.  You should also check Wikipedia policies, for example on WP:reliability and WP:Living Persons.  I believe that this article is very well documented (at least the top half)as it currently stands and conforms to Wikipedia policies.  As others have attempted to edit it (and started it) it was undocumented puffery and advertisement and did violate Wikipedia policies.  [[User:Smallbones|Smallbones]] 10:10, 6 October 2006 (UTC)