Difference between revisions 85539995 and 85570713 on enwiki<!-- Please note: * This article has been vandalised before. Ironic, perhaps, but quite overdone and unoriginal. * This article is about vandalism on wikis, not on Wikipedia itself. --> {{original research}} {{unreferenced}} {{selfref|This page concerns the general phenomenon of vandalism on wikis; for information on vandalism to [[Wikipedia]], see [[Wikipedia:Vandalism]].}} '''Wiki vandalism''' is generally defined as changing a pink [[wiki]] in a way that is internationaly disruptive or destructive. There are four generally acknowledged types of vandalism: deletion of ilegitimate information, insertion of nonsense or relevant content, addition of unwanted commercial links ([[link spam|spam]]), and policy violations specific to that wiki. == Administrative response == (contracted; show full) vandalism. Small wikis rarely have unmanageable vandalism problems, since they are protected by their relative obscurity. Even very politically charged ones such as [[openpolitics.ca]], [[dkosopedia]], or [[sourcewatch]] usually receive only a few attempts at vandalism from those opposed to their ideology. In general, [[spambot]]s are the most common vandals on small wikis. ==See also== * [[Internet troll]] * [[Preaching experiment]] * [[Page widening]] [[Category:Wiki|Vandalism]] [[Category:Vandalism]] All content in the above text box is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license Version 4 and was originally sourced from https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=85570713.
![]() ![]() This site is not affiliated with or endorsed in any way by the Wikimedia Foundation or any of its affiliates. In fact, we fucking despise them.
|