Difference between revisions 898368015 and 898368271 on enwiki

{{short description|Page for reporting and discussing incidents that require the intervention of administrators and experienced editors}}
<noinclude><!-- Inside the noinclude, because this page is transcluded.-->{{Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentsHeader}}</noinclude>__TOC__{{clear}}
{{User:MiszaBot/config
|archiveheader = {{Administrators' noticeboard navbox all}}
|maxarchivesize = 800K
|counter = 1010  
|algo = old(72h)
(contracted; show full)

Sorry if this is all a bit vague, but the claim in that final talk page message just weirded me out enough that I thought that maybe some more experienced eyes might be able to sort this out.  &ndash;[[User:Deacon Vorbis|Deacon Vorbis]]&nbsp;([[User Talk:Deacon Vorbis|carbon]]&nbsp;&bull;&nbsp;[[Special:Contributions/Deacon Vorbis|videos]]) 01:33, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
: {{Non-admin comment}} {{User|Vesuvius
  Dogg}} (the editor referenced in the diff you linked) definitely looks like the same editor based on edit summaries. I agree that this looks oddly familiar in some other way, but I can't put my finger on it either. I'll keep my eyes open too. Given that both are (supposedly) inactive, not sure if it's worth opening an SPI, and I don't think they've been disruptive enough for a CU. [[User:Creffett|creffett]] ([[User talk:Creffett|talk]]) 03:09, 23 May 2019 (UTC)