Difference between revisions 9096123 and 16066076 on enwiki

< previous diff
next diff >
User talk:IHATENAZIPIGS
Hey the name doesn't describe you uniquely.  EVERYBODY HATES NAZI PIGS. Would you please choose a different idenifier ? It seems unliklly that a man of Jimbo's declared principles will ban your username. Also he is way too smart to be caught up in a fight that would require him to hold the position that your user name is offensive. Get a new name: this one could be save for instances where a sysop is acting tyranically. It would certainly get everybodies attention when you really want it. If you knew [[NPOV]] and use closely resond short posts to make your case then every intelligent person here will  will look when and where you alert them.

Your actions show passion, intelligence and daring. Taking the fight to the straight to the Overlord in a [[panopticon]] enviroment shows your personal courage. In the triumverate of greatest virtues, Applying the Force of  Truth is the most important to the world we live. It combines Will with Wisdom and Love as action on this beautiful garden planet.

Feed your head this:

Every article whose statement depends on a logical fallacy is inherently POV; its the point of view of the stupid!  [[User:Two16]]

One problem: I don't think there have ever been any Nazi pigs in the course of history.  Pigs run around going "oink oink oink," dig up the dirt, and munch on the slop the farmer feeds them.  Have any of these animals ever become Nazis?  I don't think so.  -- [[User:Modemac|Modemac]] 14:46 Feb 8, 2003 (UTC)

::::*cough cough* SATIRE *cough cough

(contracted; show full)d be ashamed of themselves if they cannot do furthur analysis of poetical technique on either sentence. [[Satire]] would be one. Do youse gets when youse bin satarized?  3/4 points if you don't use the language of  English critiicism. Youse have already picked the low hanging fruit, Don't you know how many articles will need to be refactored or rewritten to take this in to account:
* Every article whose statement depends on a logical fallacy is inherently POV; its the point of view of the stupid!