Difference between revisions 914581 and 914615 on enwiki'''Innovative defenses''' ('''creative lawyering''') (as terms of [[jurisprudence]]) arethe invention of which is sometimes called '''''creative lawyering''''') are relatively new and untried [[defenses]]s, perhaps best categorized as for having commited a criminal act. Being innovative, there is little or no [[precedent]] bearing upon them. They seek to [[justify|justification]]s and/ or [[excuse]]s, which are relatively new and untried (and thus have little [[precedent]]); via which, a [[defendant]] may argue that they the crime, arguing that the [[defendant]] should not be held [[crime|criminally]] [[liability|liable]] for [[action]]s which broke the [[law]]. ⏎ ⏎ ⏎ ⏎ In ''[[USA Today]]'' ([[April 12]], [[1995]]), [[David Rosenhan]] was quoted, "We're getting to see some very, very interesting [defenses], and obviously some long shots...There are a terrific number of them." Such defenses include: * the [[abuse defense]] * [[premenstrual stress syndrome]] * the [[biological defense]] (the "Twinkie defense") * "[[black rage]]" * "[[gay panic defense]]" ⏎ * [[urban survival syndrome]]. All content in the above text box is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license Version 4 and was originally sourced from https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=914615.
![]() ![]() This site is not affiliated with or endorsed in any way by the Wikimedia Foundation or any of its affiliates. In fact, we fucking despise them.
|