If you spot content on this site that is genuinely illegal or actually puts someone in real danger, contact [email protected]. We have multiple agents reviewing tickets 24/7. Note that we try to maintain as much transparency as possible, both about ourselves and of the actions of Wikipedians. For example, if we removed a live link to CSAM content that was posted by a Wikipedia admin, we would replace it a placeholder like "<link to CSAM that was posted by Demiurge1000 redacted by Undersight>". Note that "I don't like it" is NOT a valid removal reason.

If instead you are a Wikipedophile trying to get all the dark secrets of Wikipedia censored, please follow this guide instead.

If you would like to contact the owner of this about something else (e.g. press inquires, feature requests, bug reports), e-mail [email protected] or [email protected].

Revision 1295375 of "Wikipedia:Votes_for_deletion/Computers_in_postmodernity" on enwiki

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below[[Template:Vfd top|.]] '''This page is no longer live.''' Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. <br >The result of the debate was - no consensus

===[[Computers in postmodernity]]===
Appears to be original research, unencyclopedic. -- [[User:Babomb|Babomb]] 16:36, 18 Dec 2004 (UTC)

*'''Keep''' Needs work but I can see an article there. The au. does quote a number of sources, so it's more than original research. --[[User:LeeHunter|LeeHunter]] 18:10, 18 Dec 2004 (UTC)
*'''Delete''', yes it quotes some other sources (the author should read [[Wikipedia:Citing Wikipedia]] by the way), but it's still original literature research. [[User:Fvw|&#0xfeff;]]--[[User:fvw|fvw]][[User talk:Fvw|<SMALL><FONT COLOR="green">*</FONT></SMALL>]] 18:17, 2004 Dec 18 (UTC)
*'''Delete''', original research, essay, codswallop. [[User:Wyss|Wyss]] 23:30, 18 Dec 2004 (UTC)
*'''Delete''', parody of a term paper, complete with ritual kowtowing to eminent obscurantists. -- [[User:Hoary|Hoary]] 02:13, 2004 Dec 19 (UTC)
*'''del''' [[User:Mikkalai|Mikkalai]] 02:30, 19 Dec 2004 (UTC)
*Essay. I don't have time to evaluate it. I suggest we move it (without redirect) to something like [[Talk:postmodernism/donated essay]], link from [[Talk:postmodernism]], and see if anyone can usefully mine it. -- [[User:Jmabel|Jmabel]] | [[User talk:Jmabel|Talk]] 05:50, Dec 19, 2004 (UTC)
*Do we have a place to transwiki this kind of stuff? - [[User:Andre Engels|Andre Engels]] 22:10, 19 Dec 2004 (UTC)
*Delete: essay. I doubt if other wikis would be happy for us to dump this on their doorsteps. [[User:Wile E. Heresiarch|Wile E. Heresiarch]] 05:49, 23 Dec 2004 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' Many of these are standard points that come up in postmodernism.  Computers are often given as an example of postmodernism for the reasons presented in the article.  If it's common knowledge among those who study postmodernism, it's not original research.  (Could use clean up though, which IMO would fix that its suggestive of an essay)--[[User:Nectarflowed|Nectarflowed]] 06:05, 23 Dec 2004 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' Needs wikification. [[User:Masterhomer|Masterhomer]] 17:45, 23 Dec 2004 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. '''Please do not edit this page'''[[Template:Vfd bottom|.]]

All content in the above text box is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license Version 4 and was originally sourced from https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?oldid=1295375.

This site is not affiliated with or endorsed in any way by the Wikimedia Foundation or any of its affiliates. In fact, we fucking despise them.