Revision 162594582 of "User talk:Neutrality" on enwiki

{{User:Neutrality/talk template}}
==Douglas MacArthur==
The [[Douglas MacArthur]] article received heavy editing today by new/unregistered users, which I noticed at [http://www.wikirage.com WikiRage.com]. According to [http://vs.aka-online.de/wppagehiststat/ Wikipedia Page History Statistics,] you are one of the top Git -R- Done contributors to that page. If you think your efforts to improve that article would be aided if new and unregistered users were blocked from editing that article, please let me know and I will protect the article. Thanks. -- <font face="Kristen ITC">'''[[User:Jreferee|<font color="Blue">Jreferee</font>]]''' <sup>''([[User talk:Jreferee|Talk]])''</sup></font> 08:19, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
==Orphaned non-free media (Image:BBC Children in Need logo.png)==
[[Image:Nuvola apps important blue.svg|25px]] Thanks for uploading '''[[:Image:BBC Children in Need logo.png]]'''. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a [[WP:FU|claim of fair use]]. However, it is currently [[Wikipedia:Orphan|orphaned]], meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. [[WP:BOLD|You may add it back]] if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see [[Wikipedia:Non-free content#Policy|our policy for non-free media]]).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "[[Special:Contributions/{{PAGENAME}}|my contributions]]" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described on [[wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images.2FMedia|criteria for speedy deletion]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Orphaned --> [[User:BetacommandBot|BetacommandBot]] 04:52, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

== [[Wikipedia:Article improvement]] ==

Hi. I created this page because of a proposal you made in 2004. [[User:A.Z.|A.Z.]] 22:25, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

== Replaceable fair use Image:Taiwan_Firecrest.jpg ==
[[Image:Nuvola apps important.svg|32px|left|Replaceable fair use]]
Thanks for uploading '''[[:Image:Taiwan_Firecrest.jpg]]'''. I noticed the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under [[Wikipedia:Fair use|fair use]], but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our [[Wikipedia:Fair use criteria|first fair use criterion]] in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

# Go to [[:Image:Taiwan_Firecrest.jpg|the image description page]] and edit it to add {{tlx|di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, '''without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template'''.
# On [[Image talk:Taiwan_Firecrest.jpg|the image discussion page]], write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, [[Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission|requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license]], or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on <span class="plainlinks">[{{fullurl:Special:Contributions|target={{PAGENAMEE}}&namespace=6}} this link]</span>. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our [[WP:FUC|Fair Use policy]].  If you have any questions please ask them at the [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions|Media copyright questions page]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:di-replaceable fair use-notice --> [[User:Calliopejen1|Calliopejen1]] 22:27, 3 October 2007 (UTC)


==Non-free use disputed for Image:John_Geddes_Lawrence_and_Tyron_Garner.jpg==
Thanks for uploading '''[[:Image:John_Geddes_Lawrence_and_Tyron_Garner.jpg]]'''. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at [[Wikipedia:Non-free content]] carefully, then go to [[:Image:John_Geddes_Lawrence_and_Tyron_Garner.jpg|the image description page]] and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at [[Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline]] is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted after  seven days according to our [[WP:CSD#Images/media|Criteria for speedy deletion]]. If you have any questions please ask them at the [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions|Media copyright questions page]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:No fair --> [[User:Calliopejen1|Calliopejen1]] 01:21, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
==[[Hugo Black III]]==
Thanks for the additional info on Mr. Black. [[User:Callelinea|Callelinea]] 21:26, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

== TrueOrigin Archive AfD ==

Hi - I was wondering if you might consider rescinding your AfD on [[TrueOrigin Archive]]? It had only been up for '''two minutes''' before you AfD'd it; no one even got a chance to discuss it on the Talk page, there wasn't even time for a {{tl|notability}} tag or a {{tl|NPOV}} tag or an '''ANYTHING''' tag, so that it might be resolved in Talk. As it is, the AfD page has now become the article's Talk page, and the discussion is centering on why this was done after two minutes instead of giving it enough time to be discussed on the Talk page.

I'm not saying the article ''shouldn't'' be deleted. Maybe it should, if there's consensus for that. But shouldn't WP editors be given the chance to ''work'' on the article first?

Thanks for your time. --[[User:Profg|profg]] 03:21, 6 October 2007 (UTC)