Revision 3267981 of "Talk:Grrr" on enwiki

No consensus to delete this page. VfD talk below. -- [[User:Cecropia|Cecropia]] 15:00, 20 Apr 2004 (UTC)
----
[[Grr]] -- dictionary definition (very funny, but does not belong here) -- [[User:Francs2000|Graham  :)]] | [[User talk:Francs2000|Talk]] 13:15, 13 Apr 2004 (UTC)

* <s>BJAODN -- [[User:Cyrius|Cyrius]]|[[User talk:Cyrius|&#9998]] 17:17, Apr 13, 2004 (UTC)</s>
** This article has grown on me, so I can't vote delete. It is still dumb, so I can't actively vote keep for it either. -- [[User:Cyrius|Cyrius]]|[[User talk:Cyrius|&#9998]] 02:54, Apr 20, 2004 (UTC)
* Yeah, BJAODN. [[User:Fredrik|Fredrik]] 20:22, 14 Apr 2004 (UTC)
* This article is freaking fantastic.  [[User:Exploding Boy|Exploding Boy]] 14:38, Apr 15, 2004 (UTC)
** You may want to clarify whether you mean to keep it or delete it. [[User:Wile E. Heresiarch|Wile E. Heresiarch]] 13:40, 16 Apr 2004 (UTC)
*** Sadly, I must choose to abstain.  [[User:Exploding Boy|Exploding Boy]] 15:33, Apr 16, 2004 (UTC)
**** Hmm, what's up with that? Curiously, [[User:Wile E. Heresiarch|Wile E. Heresiarch]] 19:44, 16 Apr 2004 (UTC)
* My problem is: is it with 2 or 3 ''r'' 's? Delete. [[User:Pfortuny|Pfortuny]] 09:32, 16 Apr 2004 (UTC)
** That's an easy one. Make a redirect. [[User:Mikkalai|Mikkalai]] 02:28, 17 Apr 2004 (UTC) 
* Keep: informative. And it's funny too! Awesome. [[User:Wile E. Heresiarch|Wile E. Heresiarch]] 13:40, 16 Apr 2004 (UTC)
* Merge into [[Onomatopoeia]]. -- [[User:Tillwe|till we *)]] 19:57, 16 Apr 2004 (UTC)
*Heh. BJAODN. [[User:Ambivalenthysteria|Ambivalenthysteria]] 04:10, 17 Apr 2004 (UTC)
*''The correct response to this type of grr, is always "Easy tiger"'' - great. Definitely save in BJAODN. [[User:MK|MK]] 07:33, 17 Apr 2004 (UTC)
*(idunnoWhattodo) Ugh.  Does ''save in [[BJAODN]]'' mean ''delete'' and save, or ''link to from...''??  Or should this go to wiktionary? --[[User:Ssd|ssd]]
* A good informative page, by all means keep! Redirect "grrr" to it as well. ^_^
* Keep. A valid article for a real thing. I fail to see why it is BJ. [[User:Mikkalai|Mikkalai]] 20:18, 17 Apr 2004 (UTC)
* Keep and move to cleanup. [[User:Guanaco|Guanaco]] 19:15, 18 Apr 2004 (UTC)
*Informative and factual. (Hint: some more info on usage in comic strips would not hurt). Keep. [[User:62.214.29.88|62.214.29.88]]
** Anon votes are ignored, so you better register, if you want your opinion counted. [[User:Mikkalai|Mikkalai]] 19:50, 19 Apr 2004 (UTC) 
* Actually, I guess I should vote.  Part of me really wants to keep this, but while I think the article's hilarious it's not encyclopaedic, or at least large swaths of it aren't. Relevant sections should be merged with onomatopoiea and the rest put on BJAODN.  [[User:Exploding Boy|Exploding Boy]] 14:04, Apr 19, 2004 (UTC)
**Which exactly sections of the article do you consider non-enc? Until reading the article I didn't suspect the 2nd and 3rd usages. If they are true, then it is legit part of knowledge. [[User:Mikkalai|Mikkalai]] 19:48, 19 Apr 2004 (UTC)
**How about the entire "To show anger" and "As a sex thing" sections for a start.  [[User:Exploding Boy|Exploding Boy]] 22:33, Apr 19, 2004 (UTC)
*** I agree that they are written quite frivolously, but I wouldn't call the topic itself nonenc. [[User:Mikkalai|Mikkalai]]
* Keep. Not really a dictionary definition, and being funny is not a strike against it.  It follows an encyclopedic format better than many articles.  Indeed, that's a large part of what makes this so funny.  Oh.  And it it's cleaned up (which it needs to be), this copy ''must'' go into BJAODN. [[User:Cool Hand Luke|CHL]] 23:38, 19 Apr 2004 (UTC)