If you spot content on this site that is genuinely illegal or actually puts someone in real danger, contact [email protected]. We have multiple agents reviewing tickets 24/7. Note that we try to maintain as much transparency as possible, both about ourselves and of the actions of Wikipedians. For example, if we removed a live link to CSAM content that was posted by a Wikipedia admin, we would replace it a placeholder like "<link to CSAM that was posted by Demiurge1000 redacted by Undersight>". Note that "I don't like it" is NOT a valid removal reason.

If instead you are a Wikipedophile trying to get all the dark secrets of Wikipedia censored, please follow this guide instead.

If you would like to contact the owner of this about something else (e.g. press inquires, feature requests, bug reports), e-mail [email protected] or [email protected].

Revision 349256 of "Talk:Dispute_over_the_definition_of_object-oriented_programming" on enwiki

So, what is the dispute exactly? [[User:(|(]] 09:18, 25 Oct 2003 (UTC)

: I have no idea. Object-oriented programming is well defined. [[User:Dysprosia|Dysprosia]] 09:23, 25 Oct 2003 (UTC)

::It's Taku versus everyone. The debate stretches over many pages:

::*[[Talk:Window class]]
::*[[Talk:Object-oriented programming]]
::*[[Talk:Class (object-oriented programming)]]
::*[[Talk:Inheritance (object-oriented programming)]]
::*Various user talk pages
::*Here

::And it's been going on for months. A slow-burning forest fire. -- [[User:Tim Starling|Tim Starling]] 00:01, Oct 31, 2003 (UTC)

:::You forgot [[Wikipedia:Votes for deletion|VfD]], [[Wikipedia:List of controversial issues|List of controversial issues]] and [[Wikipedia:Current disputes over articles|Current disputes over articles]]. Maybe other places too. :( [[User:Angela|Angela]]

I have to say that you need to study OOP if you want what are dispute we have. -- [[User:TakuyaMurata|Taku]] 00:28, Oct 31, 2003 (UTC)

:Sorry? Say that again? -- [[User:Tim Starling|Tim Starling]] 00:33, Oct 31, 2003 (UTC)

::I tried and failed to come up with an complete parse, but I think he's saying that he understands OOP and you don't. I'm half-inclined to start doing some mass-reversion, since the message is simply not getting through and it would be easier to start over than to try to fix the articles he's mangled. [[User:Stan Shebs|Stan]] 02:50, 31 Oct 2003 (UTC)

I would like to politely request that Taku cease editing computer science articles in future in order not to get them all mangled. I don't know if anyone would like to second this proposal. I've not taken any part in discussions surrounding the controversy of Taku's interpretation of various concepts recently. I've been rather busy recently, but I also didn't want to enflame the situation. I can see that I'm not alone in being frustrated with some of Taku's contributions. [[User:Mintguy|Mintguy]] 23:51, 31 Oct 2003 (UTC)
----
Moved from VfD:

[[Dispute over the definition of object-oriented programming|This]] appears to be something that was created over an edit dispute regarding [[Object Oriented Programming]]. It hasn't been touched since Oct 2003 and it doesn't seem to actually say anything. The [[Talk:Dispute_over_the_definition_of_object-oriented_programming|talk page]] is not particularly enlightening either. -- [[User:Friedo|Friedo]] 00:26, 1 Apr 2004 (UTC)

* Delete -- [[User:Cyrius|Cyrius]] | [[User talk:Cyrius|Talk]] 01:24, Apr 1, 2004 (UTC)
* Delete [[User:Ashibaka|Ashibaka]] [[User talk:Ashibaka|&#9998;]] 02:24, 1 Apr 2004 (UTC)
* Delete. -- [[User:TakuyaMurata|Taku]] 02:34, Apr 1, 2004 (UTC)
* The talk for this, should be archived somewhere, for when (if) Taku comes back. I don't want to go through thisall over again. but it definitely shouldn't be in the main namespace. [[User:Mintguy|Mintguy]] [[User talk: Mintguy|(T)]]

All content in the above text box is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license Version 4 and was originally sourced from https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?oldid=349256.

This site is not affiliated with or endorsed in any way by the Wikimedia Foundation or any of its affiliates. In fact, we fucking despise them.