What's with the teddy bear? I don't think it helps much and is potentially distracting. --[[User:Fastfission|Fastfission]] 20:09, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
:I reverted to a version without the extra objects. They are unnecessary and make the picture look unencyclopedic. --[[User:Fastfission|Fastfission]] 20:13, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
I think some people don't like the teddy bear because it might imply pedaphilia related overtones.[[User:24.97.252.34|24.97.252.34]] 20:22, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
: Sometimes a teddy bear is just a teddy bear. Most of these pictures have extraneous objects in them, and I don't see why this one should be any different.--[[User:Prosfilaes|Prosfilaes]] 18:15, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
:I actually think that it looks better with the teddy bear. It makes it feel that the couple aren't thinking about anything else around them, just each other. -- [[User:Lardarse|Lardarse]] 11:09, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
:: Agree with Lardarse. Also, the woman is clearly of age. [[User:Babajobu|Babajobu]] 11:19, 2 October 2005 (UTC)
::: ''Clearly of age''? She looks no more than 30 to me. But the most worrying thing to me is that it looks like her left arm is missing... --[[User:Lardarse|Lardarse]] 00:36, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
::: Or am I just going mad... 00:40, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
:::: Her left arm and hand seem to be directly under his right arm and hand. Their palms are touching. It's a very intimate posture. [[User:Babajobu|Babajobu]] 01:00, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
::::: Oh yes, I see it now. You can tell I'm still a virgin, can't you... --[[User:Lardarse|Lardarse]] 02:57, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
----
The following conversation took place moments ago on my [[Eggdrop]]:
<pre><cuervo> more importantly
<cuervo> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Missionary_Sex_Position.png
<cuervo> WHAT THE FUCK IS THE TEDDY BEAR DOING IN THAT PICTURE
<datamorph> god i hate sex and the city
<datamorph> so ffucking unbelieveably much</pre>
So, it caught me slightly offguard, but datamorph didn't seem to notice too much.
Also, he gave a negative review of [[Sex and the City]]. --Jack ([[User:Cuervo|Cuervo]]) 16:13, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
----
Uhm, apparently so apparently "rev" stands for "revert". Sorry, was confused. Image back to what it was before I showed up. [[User:Zyqqh|Zyqqh]] 08:00, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
: ditto^ --[[User:Piemanmoo|Piemanmoo]] 06:43, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
Sorry, accidentally reverted to an earlier version, put it right though. <b><font face="Verdana" size="4" color="#FF0000">[[User:Haza-w|haz]]</font></b> ([[User_talk:Haza-w|user talk]]) 16:17, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
:: Why has the teddy bear again been deleted? It absolutely does not suggest that the woman is underage, she is very clearly a grown/young woman who still keeps a teddy bear. It adds a nice color and authenticity to the photo, and suggests they are in her bedroom rather than his. Most importantly, there is no reason to take it out. [[User:Babajobu|Babajobu]] 12:10, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
== Teddy bear in picture ==
A decision needs to be made about the damn teddy. [[User:Babajobu|Babajobu]] has reverted the image back to the version with the teddy in it. Any thoughts? <b><font face="Verdana" size="4" color="#FF0000">[[User:Haza-w|haz]]</font></b> ([[User_talk:Haza-w|user talk]]) 14:02, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
: I reverted back because no explanation was given for cropping out the teddy bear. What are the issues here? [[User:Babajobu|Babajobu]] 14:10, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
:: *audible blink* I never imagined teddy bears to be so controversial. I, for one, see it as an important thematic element, providing context for the illustration :)
:: [[User:Adrian Lamo|Adrian Lamo]] · [[User talk:Adrian Lamo|<small>(talk)</small>]] · <small>[[Special:Emailuser/Adrian Lamo|(mail)]]</small> · 04:24, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
::: Agree 100%. [[User:Babajobu|Babajobu]] 04:37, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
:::It makes a nice balance in the illustration. I guess some people don't want objects representing innocence attached to sex, but I really like it there better. — [[User:Laurascudder|Laura Scudder]] [[User talk:Laurascudder|☎]] 14:33, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
* Keep the bear. ([[User:Ibaranoff24|Ibaranoff24]] 01:02, 28 January 2006 (UTC))
'''Comment''': The bear makes it look like [[childporn]] and/or [[Hentai]]. I laughed when I saw this pic....[[User:Deckiller|Deckiller]] 17:25, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
: Poppycock...the woman in the picture is plainly an adult. And if you've ever slept with college-age girls (or are one yourself) you'll know that plenty of them have stuffed animals. [[User:Babajobu|Babajobu]] 18:01, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
:: Point. I was just making a silly comment anyway :) [[User:Deckiller|Deckiller]] 18:03, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
:'''Comment:''' The bear is distracting, artistic though it may be. The point of this encyclopedia, I would hope, is to be efficiently descriptive; is this teddy bear necessary to the understanding of "missionary position"? I could understand such a detail left in a picture, but this is a diagram. There is no need for artistry or what has obviously become a contentious detail. Lose the bear.[[User:VitaminE|VitaminE]] 21:26, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
:I like the bear. Keep it. —[[User:Nightstallion|<span style="font-variant:small-caps">Nightst</span>]]<font color="green">[[User:Nightstallion/esperanza|<span style="font-variant:small-caps">a</span>]]</font>[[User:Nightstallion|<span style="font-variant:small-caps">llion</span>]] [[User talk:Nightstallion|''(?)'']] 10:39, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
What, you mean missionary sex does not require having a teddy bear around? The image had me confused, I thought it was the very defining element of that position... :(
*Enough people are clearly confused by the teddy bear to warrant it being. This is an encyclopedia, and there is no reason to keep something silly like this around. The fact that there are 20 people on this page asking "what's up with the bear?" is proof enough of it being an unnecessary distraction, in my opinion. --[[User:Fastfission|Fastfission]] 02:34, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
*: There's not 20 people on this page asking "what's up with the bear". There's about three or four, and about ten saying that it looks good.--[[User:Prosfilaes|Prosfilaes]] 03:13, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
it adds a discussion to a completely un-intellectual subject, what exactly would the motivations be for looking this up? adding some quirk to the "illustration" imrpoves the memorability of it.
or something.
leave the bear!
[[User:Shamrox|Shamrox]] 03:26, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed in any way by the Wikimedia Foundation or any of its affiliates. In fact, we fucking despise them.
|
