Revision 6704500 of "Talk:Grrr" on enwiki

No consensus to delete this page. VfD talk below. -- [[User:Cecropia|Cecropia]] 15:00, 20 Apr 2004 (UTC)
----
[[Grr]] -- dictionary definition (very funny, but does not belong here) -- [[User:Francs2000|Graham  :)]] | [[User talk:Francs2000|Talk]] 13:15, 13 Apr 2004 (UTC)

* <s>BJAODN -- [[User:Cyrius|Cyrius]]|[[User talk:Cyrius|&#9998]] 17:17, Apr 13, 2004 (UTC)</s>
** This article has grown on me, so I can't vote delete. It is still dumb, so I can't actively vote keep for it either. -- [[User:Cyrius|Cyrius]]|[[User talk:Cyrius|&#9998]] 02:54, Apr 20, 2004 (UTC)
* Yeah, BJAODN. [[User:Fredrik|Fredrik]] 20:22, 14 Apr 2004 (UTC)
* This article is freaking fantastic.  [[User:Exploding Boy|Exploding Boy]] 14:38, Apr 15, 2004 (UTC)
** You may want to clarify whether you mean to keep it or delete it. [[User:Wile E. Heresiarch|Wile E. Heresiarch]] 13:40, 16 Apr 2004 (UTC)
*** Sadly, I must choose to abstain.  [[User:Exploding Boy|Exploding Boy]] 15:33, Apr 16, 2004 (UTC)
**** Hmm, what's up with that? Curiously, [[User:Wile E. Heresiarch|Wile E. Heresiarch]] 19:44, 16 Apr 2004 (UTC)
* My problem is: is it with 2 or 3 ''r'' 's? Delete. [[User:Pfortuny|Pfortuny]] 09:32, 16 Apr 2004 (UTC)
** That's an easy one. Make a redirect. [[User:Mikkalai|Mikkalai]] 02:28, 17 Apr 2004 (UTC) 
* Keep: informative. And it's funny too! Awesome. [[User:Wile E. Heresiarch|Wile E. Heresiarch]] 13:40, 16 Apr 2004 (UTC)
* Merge into [[Onomatopoeia]]. -- [[User:Tillwe|till we *)]] 19:57, 16 Apr 2004 (UTC)
*Heh. BJAODN. [[User:Ambivalenthysteria|Ambivalenthysteria]] 04:10, 17 Apr 2004 (UTC)
*''The correct response to this type of grr, is always "Easy tiger"'' - great. Definitely save in BJAODN. [[User:MK|MK]] 07:33, 17 Apr 2004 (UTC)
*(idunnoWhattodo) Ugh.  Does ''save in [[BJAODN]]'' mean ''delete'' and save, or ''link to from...''??  Or should this go to wiktionary? --[[User:Ssd|ssd]]
* A good informative page, by all means keep! Redirect "grrr" to it as well. ^_^
* Keep. A valid article for a real thing. I fail to see why it is BJ. [[User:Mikkalai|Mikkalai]] 20:18, 17 Apr 2004 (UTC)
* Keep and move to cleanup. [[User:Guanaco|Guanaco]] 19:15, 18 Apr 2004 (UTC)
*Informative and factual. (Hint: some more info on usage in comic strips would not hurt). Keep. [[User:62.214.29.88|62.214.29.88]]
** Anon votes are ignored, so you better register, if you want your opinion counted. [[User:Mikkalai|Mikkalai]] 19:50, 19 Apr 2004 (UTC) 
* Actually, I guess I should vote.  Part of me really wants to keep this, but while I think the article's hilarious it's not encyclopaedic, or at least large swaths of it aren't. Relevant sections should be merged with onomatopoiea and the rest put on BJAODN.  [[User:Exploding Boy|Exploding Boy]] 14:04, Apr 19, 2004 (UTC)
**Which exactly sections of the article do you consider non-enc? Until reading the article I didn't suspect the 2nd and 3rd usages. If they are true, then it is legit part of knowledge. [[User:Mikkalai|Mikkalai]] 19:48, 19 Apr 2004 (UTC)
**How about the entire "To show anger" and "As a sex thing" sections for a start.  [[User:Exploding Boy|Exploding Boy]] 22:33, Apr 19, 2004 (UTC)
*** I agree that they are written quite frivolously, but I wouldn't call the topic itself nonenc. [[User:Mikkalai|Mikkalai]]
* Keep. Not really a dictionary definition, and being funny is not a strike against it.  It follows an encyclopedic format better than many articles.  Indeed, that's a large part of what makes this so funny.  Oh.  And it it's cleaned up (which it needs to be), this copy ''must'' go into BJAODN. [[User:Cool Hand Luke|CHL]] 23:38, 19 Apr 2004 (UTC)
**Yep. If I ever become full of vanity and start listing "my first zillion articles" on my userpage, I'll begin the list of pride with "Wikifying [[Grr]]". [[User:Mikkalai|Mikkalai]] 16:45, 20 Apr 2004 (UTC)
***So grr is allowed to stay now it's been wikified?  :-) Brilliant.
**** grr.
***** Easy tiger!

== Condition of article ==

OK, if this is being kept, the language needs to not be quite so low-brow. [[User:Zoney|'''zoney''']] '''&#09619;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&#09618;''' [[User talk:Zoney|'''talk''']] 15:27, 8 Sep 2004 (UTC)

== cleanup? ==

Um, i only want the article on cleanup, not deleted. [[User:Mikkalai|Mikkalai]], what's pertinent on this talk page? [[User:Pyrop|Pyrop]] 01:27, Oct 19, 2004 (UTC)
:The pertinent is that it have already undergone cleanup (see also its history). The article looks silly, because the subject is silly by itself. The VfD discussion generally agreed that silliness has its rights as well. Do you really think there is something serious that can be written in this article? If yes, please do so.  [[User:Mikkalai|Mikkalai]] 01:56, 19 Oct 2004 (UTC)

==Revert==

Reverted the article. Keep vote doesn't mean it doesn't need any sort of change. "The correct response to this type of grr, is always "Easy tiger"."? Tell me that's a factual statement that belongs in an encyclopedia. -[[User:R. fiend|R. fiend]] 14:36, 19 Oct 2004 (UTC)
:: That's a factual statement that belongs in an encyclopedia.  :) [[User:TomCerul|TomCerul]] 15:00, 19 Oct 2004 (UTC)
::: Well, as long as we're nitpicking... what is "animal type lust" and how does it differ from ordinary garden-variety human lust? [[User:Dpbsmith|[[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] [[User_talk:dpbsmith|(talk)]]]] 15:59, 19 Oct 2004 (UTC)