Difference between revisions 1530436 and 1530438 on enwikinews

< previous diff
next diff >
User:Pi zero/Pillars of Wikinews writing
{{DISPLAYTITLE:{{#if:{{#titleparts:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|-1}}|{{#titleparts:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|-1}}/|{{NAMESPACE}}:}}Pillars of ''Wikinews'' writing}}
{{ambox|image=[[File:Purple question mark.svg|30px]]|text=This is a developing draft for a possible {{tl|Wikinews essay}}.}}
<!-- {{Wikinews essay}} -->

(contracted; show full)

:: The need for thorough sourcing also applies to [[WN:original reporting|original reporting]], though it works differently from sourcing of synthesis.  OR is difficult, demanding, and highly esteemed on ''Wikinews''.

* Each article is '''neutral'''.

:: Report the news impartially.  Don't assert opinions &mdash; attribute them to the party who said them.  Most analysis is opinion
, so and as such, if included at all, must likewise be presented as anbe attributed claim.  If an article focuses on just part of a story, the choice of part must not itself become misleading: the choice must be clear to the reader.

* Each article is '''newsworthy'''.

(contracted; show full)er to.  So you need to explain (succinctly if it's in the lede, yet more in the headline) things like what profession the person is in, what sport the teams plays, what country the city is in or team or person is from.  Don't assume the reader is already familiar with, say, a sensational criminal case, either; they can look up details later (hopefully, on ''Wikinews''&nbsp;:-), but tell them enough that they won't be confused now.

<!-- [[Category:Wikinews]] -->