Difference between revisions 1530542 and 1533084 on enwikinews

==Reporter notes==
The social media research done for this article has been/will be in part mailed to the scoop list.  When note there, the follow up information can be found in these notes.  This topic pertains to my social media research related to my PhD. --[[User:LauraHale|LauraHale]] ([[User talk:LauraHale|talk]])

The story broke late on June 11, 2012 based on USA time time stamps for articles. --[[User:LauraHale|LauraHale]] ([[User talk:LauraHale|talk]]) 22:50, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

(contracted; show full)cused of sexual harassment. It was covered by a lot of media organisations, but the story was not picked up by fans.  The story was driven by the media but it went no where.  This contrasts to say other sport stories where the story first gets picked up in social media before going to the news. --[[User:LauraHale|LauraHale]] ([[User talk:LauraHale|talk]]) 23:28, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

:: That does come through more clearly now.  --[[User:Pi zero|Pi zero]] ([[User talk:Pi zero|talk]]) 23:33, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
⏎
⏎
== Review of revision 1533067 [Not ready] ==

<!-- Submitted using easy peer review - MediaWiki:Gadget-easyPeerReview.js --> {{peer_reviewed|revid=1533067|copyright=See below.|newsworthy=pass|verifiable=See below.|npov=n/a|style=n/a|reviewer=Pi zero|comments=<br/>
* Paragraph 2 needs rewritten.  Don't direct-quote another news organization.
* I had some verification difficulties.  I checked the '''entire''' article, and these are the only verification difficulties I encountered.
:* Paragraph 5 ("Mention of..."), first sentence (and maybe slightly second), I couldn't reconcile with the graph; not sure if that's a problem with the graph rendering, so didn't attempt to adjust the article to match what the graph looked like.
:* Paragraph 6 ("Search interest..."), the key on the graph does not list this story as one of those shown.  From your reporter's notes, you seem to be treating F as this story, and I tentatively corrected on that basis; is the key wrong?
:* Paragraph 7 ("The news story did not lead..."): I'm perplexed; if I were trying to publish this time around, I'll pull this paragraph as unverified.  The graphs appear to only go up to the 11th, and if the story only broke late that day the graph should say nothing about the story... or I'm missing something.
* The headline wants improvement; it's passive voice.|time=17:40, 18 June 2012 (UTC)}}