Difference between revisions 17138722 and 17138794 on enwiktionary

==''[[cane]]'' and ''[[can]]'' in [[w:consilience|consilience]] ==

{| align=center
| width=50% |
 eng:	{{l|en|cane}}
 esp:	{{l|es|caña}}
 fre:	{{l|fr|canne}}
 ita:	{{l|it|canna}}
(contracted; show full)

:: In a way, science looks like a double helix such as DNA, with empiricism and rationalism intertwined cooperatingly rather than conflictingly. The test is empiricist, and the rest is rationalist. Both are ''yang'' and ''yin'', respectively, making up the ''universe''!


:: Nevertheless, hard-testing empiricists or positivists may blame rationalists or interpretivists for their easy-going theories or theses, which though may open up a new horizon, including new empiricist jobs.

:: Focally you seem to argue that the modern Japanese reading ''kan'' and meaning "tube" of [[管]], for example, might be too different from the ancient Chinese originality to be seriously or etymologically compared with the European counterpart, say, {{term|cane}}. 
(contracted; show full)

:: [[File:Arrowred.png|15px]] No thanks. I'm too old to take the toughest oldest tests for my favorite job. If young, you may make it yours. Cheers. --[[User:KYPark|KYPark]] ([[User talk:KYPark|talk]]) 08:05, 25 July 2012 (UTC)