Difference between revisions 17141878 and 17143932 on enwiktionary

==''[[cane]]'' and ''[[can]]'' in [[w:consilience|consilience]] ==

{| align=center
| width=50% |
 eng:	{{l|en|cane}}
 esp:	{{l|es|caña}}
 fre:	{{l|fr|canne}}
 ita:	{{l|it|canna}}
(contracted; show full) pages, but until we have evidence, the addition of such information to main entry pages will be reverted, as it was at [http://en.wiktionary.org/w/index.php?title=sugar_cane&diff=17127685&oldid=17127662 sugar cane]. -- [[User:Eirikr|Eiríkr&nbsp;Útlendi]]&nbsp;│&nbsp;<small style="position: relative; top: -3px;">''[[User talk:Eirikr|Tala&nbsp;við&nbsp;mig]]''</small> 09:08 am, 25 July 2012, last Wednesday (11 months, 31 days ago) (UTC−7)
⏎
⏎
::::	I regret you extend the manifold injustice Metaknowledge did to me by and after reverting at sugar cane immediately, hypersensitively, illegitimately, without any Talk! His likely lack of hanja knowledge must have convinced him that it was because of ''etymological relatedness'' that I added the box of [[蔗]] to [[sugar cane|that page]]. Do you agree with him indeed? But he was wrong indeed, I fear! 

::::	It was no more than ''semantic identity'', absolutely irrespective of any etymology and my theories, that drove me to do that to experiment with a new way of enhancing the Definition. Such is quite legitimate and encouraged in wikis, as you may agree. {{quote|You are welcome to add such theories on the Talk pages, but until we have evidence, the addition of such information to main entry pages will be reverted, as it was at sugar cane. -- Eiríkr Útlendi}} 

::::	You are quite right ''but for'' "as it was at sugar cane" which was definitely ill done in manifold ways. I ask you to see it through thoroughly. I greatly regret that you may not yet after you may have read my responses to Metaknowledge and Chuck Entz in the beginning. 

::::	So do I again that, whether deliberately or not, they and you in effect suggest to the readers that I am such an unlawful man as a vandal. Then I cannot help but suspect you all to make it a rule to make me sick and tired in such annoying ways, however shameful and shameless they may be. If so, please stop it right away! Why should we waste our precious time like this?

::::	How well you are inspired depends on your mindset. My table on top above all suggests to the PIE folks that English {{term|cane}} and {{term|can}} are in concert on the same etymological platform, as may be echoed [http://en.wiktionary.org/w/index.php?title=can&diff=17131502&oldid=17109004 here]  soon after my post. 

::::	Such is the case with many other European languages, hence such a great concert, which in the end might be far wider than the IE genesis. At least we are now inclined to take into account the Aramaic and Akkadian thread beyond PIE, which may probably extend even to the Far East. Now we have such a great open question we have to study neutrally from now on! 

::::	You should not warn me in advance not to bring that unsolved question into the Entry page. Please don't suggest that I am such a light-headed child. And we will not exhaust ourselves with useless precaution, such as the said ill-done revert. 
::::	--[[User:KYPark|KYPark]] ([[User talk:KYPark|talk]]) 03:47, 26 July 2012 (UTC)