Difference between revisions 17149057 and 17149153 on enwiktionary

==''[[cane]]'' and ''[[can]]'' in [[w:consilience|consilience]] ==

{| align=center
| width=50% |
 eng:	{{l|en|cane}}
 esp:	{{l|es|caña}}
 fre:	{{l|fr|canne}}
 ita:	{{l|it|canna}}
(contracted; show full)ntly stands, I'm not sure I fully understand what either of you are striving towards.  I do not mean this as a criticism, and rather as a statement of confusion.  I look forward to your replies, which will hopefully resolve my confusion.  -- Kind regards, [[User:Eirikr|Eiríkr&nbsp;Útlendi]]&nbsp;│&nbsp;<small style="position: relative; top: -3px;">''[[User talk:Eirikr|Tala&nbsp;við&nbsp;mig]]''</small> 07:51, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
{{bottom}}


{{top2}}
The following [[User talk:Jamesjiao]] 03:08, 27 July 2012 (UTC) follows [[User talk:KYPark]] 02:40, 27 July 2012 (UTC), roughly an inch above.  <br> --[[User:KYPark|KYPark]] ([[User talk:KYPark|talk]]) 11:44, 27 July 2012 (UTC) 
{{bottom}}⏎
⏎
:: I am confused as well and too long didn't read. This sentence strikes me as especially curious: "a new way of Definition to bridge West and East ". Huh? If you want to experiment anything, discuss it first with the rest of the community. I personally would've reverted your change as well. It doesn't even make any sense. Sounds more like you want to do things YOUR way, which doesn't work here, my friend. And no, a revert like this doesn't need to be communicated to you f(contracted; show full)
::::KY Park, this is verging on incomprehensibility. I am de-watchlisting this thread. My statements stand, and I am unlikely to give any further response or comment here. --[[User:Metaknowledge|Μετάknowledge]]<small><sup>''[[User talk:Metaknowledge|discuss]]/[[Special:Contributions/Metaknowledge|deeds]]''</sup></small> 06:05, 27 July 2012 (UTC)