Difference between revisions 17149164 and 17149303 on enwiktionary

==''[[cane]]'' and ''[[can]]'' in [[w:consilience|consilience]] ==

{| align=center
| width=50% |
 eng:	{{l|en|cane}}
 esp:	{{l|es|caña}}
 fre:	{{l|fr|canne}}
 ita:	{{l|it|canna}}
(contracted; show full)k page currently stands, I'm not sure I fully understand what either of you are striving towards.  I do not mean this as a criticism, and rather as a statement of confusion.  I look forward to your replies, which will hopefully resolve my confusion.  -- Kind regards, [[User:Eirikr|Eiríkr&nbsp;Útlendi]]&nbsp;│&nbsp;<small style="position: relative; top: -3px;">''[[User talk:Eirikr|Tala&nbsp;við&nbsp;mig]]''</small> 07:51, 26 July 2012 (UTC)

{{bottom}}

{{top2}}⏎
⏎
{| align=center
|⏎
 The following [[User:Jamesjiao]] talk 03:08, 27 July 2012 (UTC) ⏎
 ⏎
 follows [[User:KYPark]] talk 02:40, 27 July 2012 (UTC), roughly ⏎
 ⏎
 an inch above.  <br> --[[User:KYPark|KYPark]] ([[User talk:KYPark|talk]]) 11:44, 27 July 2012 (UTC) 
{{bottom}|}

:: I am confused as well and too long didn't read. This sentence strikes me as especially curious: "a new way of Definition to bridge West and East ". Huh? If you want to experiment anything, discuss it first with the rest of the community. I personally would've reverted your change as well. It doesn't even make any sense. Sounds more like you want to do things YOUR way, which doesn't work here, my friend. And no, a revert like this doesn't need to be communicated to yo(contracted; show full)
::::KY Park, this is verging on incomprehensibility. I am de-watchlisting this thread. My statements stand, and I am unlikely to give any further response or comment here. --[[User:Metaknowledge|Μετάknowledge]]<small><sup>''[[User talk:Metaknowledge|discuss]]/[[Special:Contributions/Metaknowledge|deeds]]''</sup></small> 06:05, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
⏎
{{bottom}}