Difference between revisions 91591 and 91595 on foundationwiki

== Template architecture ==
=== Pros ===
* Very easy to change positioning
* Easy to update all translations simultaneously
* May be easier for some to translate (clearer flow than all the wikitext)

=== Cons ===
* May be harder for ''some'' to translate
(contracted; show full)
:::Well, Timo, Andrew, Oliver, Nischay, etc. - they do not have requisition numbers, and are thus "true" contractors.  And I know that you think it's stupid to think that the IRS or the government would care, but they will, do, and have.  Tim, Mark, Guilluame, etc. - they should probably have the "international" marker if you are concerned about consistency.--[[User:Jorm|Jorm]] ([[User talk:Jorm|talk]]) 21:56, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

:::: Well, yes, I think it's stupid. But the only thing I view as worse than stupidity is inconsistent (or sloppy) stupidity. :-)  I'm not going to add a marker to anyone, as that would work against my goal. I guess we'll just need to revisit this in the future.<p>It used to be that contractors weren't even listed on this page (though that too was an inconsistent rule). This lead to the creation of [[m:Wikimedia Foundation contractors]], which subsequently faded in importance when this page's scope expanded from "Staff" to "Staff and contractors". We're making progress... it's just very slow. --[[User:MZMcBride|MZMcBride]] ([[User talk:MZMcBride|talk]]) 02:13, 20 April 2013 (UTC)

== Missing personnel JXavier & EYoung ==

Could someone please add wherever are the appropriate areas
* JXavier (WMF)
* EYoung (WMF)
Thanks  — [[user:billinghurst|billinghurst]] ''<span style="font-size:smaller">[[user talk:billinghurst|sDrewth]]</span>'' 01:18, 18 April 2013 (UTC)