Difference between revisions 569788 and 570471 on mediawikiwiki== About the use of Webfonts == It has been argued that Arial is a safe choice for the default typeface due to its availability. Using webfonts (+ Arial as fallback) could be a compatible solution that would offer more options in terms of typography. From the technical side, I think there is already webfont support through a MediaWiki extension for displaying non-latin scripts. [[User:Pginer|Pginer]] ([[User talk:Pginer|talk]]) 12:23, 19 June 2012 (UTC) == Bold italic == Sometimes bold ''and'' italics are called for; for example, when convention asks us to bold a key term (as in the lead of an encyclopedia article), but that key term is the title of a work that should be italicized, or a Latin binomial taxon. [[User:LtPowers|LtPowers]] ([[User talk:LtPowers|talk]]) 13:41, 7 August 2012 (UTC)⏎ ⏎ ==Arial?== Even before people get to the aesthetic qualities of Arial and its non-free licensing, there is a practical problem with it: It is nowhere near being a "global typeface", as this page suggests, because it covers very few writing systems: Latin, Cyrillic, Greek, Hebrew, Arabic and maybe Thai. It doesn't even cover Latin, Cyrillic and Greek well and has a lot missing characters. Forcing Arial on languages that it doesn't support is pointless: they will change it in local CSS anyway. This includes languages of West Africa, which are written in Latin, but use many characters that Arial doesn't have. I don't quite understand why should we specify an explicit font-family in the first place. People who read in languages for which fonts are easily available should be able to use their own preferred font (unless Wikipedia wants to create a unique identity for itself, but Arial is obviously not a font for unique identity). For people who read languages that Arial doesn't support at all it can a be a problem - millions of people still use browsers that don't support fallback fonts, and they will be forced to see squares instead of letters. --[[User:Amire80|Amir E. Aharoni]] ([[User talk:Amire80|talk]]) 08:51, 9 August 2012 (UTC) ==First line indentation== Is there any consideration of indenting first lines of paragraphs, like in books? Some Wikipedias use it already, for example Thai and Ossetic. --[[User:Amire80|Amir E. Aharoni]] ([[User talk:Amire80|talk]]) 08:51, 9 August 2012 (UTC) All content in the above text box is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license Version 4 and was originally sourced from https://mediawiki.org/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=570471.
![]() ![]() This site is not affiliated with or endorsed in any way by the Wikimedia Foundation or any of its affiliates. In fact, we fucking despise them.
|