Difference between revisions 2352 and 2353 on metawiki

< previous diff
next diff >
Talk:Wikipedic
What the hell is this? This is just a bad joke, right? --[[User:Maveric149|mav]]

:no, not a joke.

I recommend moving to [http://meta.wikipedia.com/ meta]. --[[User:Brion VIBBER|Brion]] 23:36 Oct 1, 2002 (UTC)

:an encylopedia of all knowledge would include meta knowledge.

(contracted; show full)

Perhaps at some point.  But our current policy is "no original research"; that is, the purpose of Wikipedia is to explain the ''present'' state of general academic fields, not to explore new ones.  Your "Wikipedic" stuff mihgt be fine as a paragraph or two inside an article about paradoxes like Russel's and others--but that's all it is, a nice example.  It is certainly not a "field of study" in any sense that ought to get its own article.


----
Brion VIBBER : (Please edit this page at its new home on the meta wiki)

You are completely missing the point that this is not "meta" content. It is antimetawikipedic by its very nature.