Revision 5274408 of "Template talk:Uw-longterm" on simplewiki

Does anyone think this should have a 1,2,3,4,4im? [[User:Krett12|Krett12]] ([[User talk:Krett12|talk]]) 01:36, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
:This template is considered equivalent to a level4im warning. It should be used for cases where there is a persistent/predictable pattern of abuse. By definition, long-term abuse is something that would not qualify for AGF (level 1, 2 warnings). [[User:Chenzw|<span style="color:brown">Chenzw</span>]]&nbsp;&nbsp;<font size="1">[[User_talk:Chenzw|<span style="color:brown">Talk</span>]]</font>&nbsp; 00:40, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
::{{ping|Chenzw}} Well, we should still have it be uw-lta4im, and just not have the others. While I myself am fine with leaving it this way, it could be considered confusing. [[User:Krett12|Krett12]] ([[User talk:Krett12|talk]]) 21:18, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
:::Your proposed renaming is really confusing and makes no logical sense.  We wouldn't do a level 4 if there wasn't also a 1-2-3.  This is more than okay as is.  [[User:Only|Only]] ([[User talk:Only|talk]]) 21:26, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
::::You're right. Long term abuse is very serious and we have no time for 1 and 2. I was thinking of something like uw-copyright, uw-error, or uw-delete. Those are all missing some levels. It's just I also wanted a level 3 in case it was a school or something (which would explain why most of them don't vandalize in the summer) [[User:Krett12|Krett12]] ([[User talk:Krett12|talk]]) 21:47, 6 December 2015 (UTC)