Revision 250292 of "Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Optional RfA candidate poll" on testwiki

 __NEWSECTIONLINK__{{shortcut|WP:ORCP}}
{{info|Read '''''[[WP:Advice for RfA candidates|Advice for RfA candidates]]''''' before you add your name to this list, otherwise you might be wasting your own and everyone else's time. Self-evaluation is very important.}}{{archives
|auto=short
|search=yes
|index=User:ClueBot III/Master Detailed Indices/Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Optional RfA candidate poll
|title=Archive index
|bot=ClueBot III
}}
{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis
|archiveprefix=Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Optional RfA candidate poll/Archive
|format= %%i
|header={{aan}}
|age=720
|maxarchsize=150000
|index=no
|archivebox=no
|archivenow=<nowiki>{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow}}</nowiki>
}}
'''Optional poll for [[Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship|RfA]] candidates'''

This is an '''optional''' polling page available to potential RfA candidates. It can be used to help see what the community thinks of your chance of success. Note that actual RfA results may differ greatly and that opinions given here may be based on only a cursory assessement.

{{color|red|'''Disclaimer:'''}} Although starting a poll here about your odds of passing a RfA can help you determine whether you're ready or not for RfA, '''nothing can replace''' reading advice pages such as [[W:WP:RFAADVICE|'''''Advice for RfA candidates''''']] and gauging your contributions relative to recent candidacies, both successful and failed. If responders indicate that you would likely pass an RfA, you are still strongly encouraged to seek a more indepth examination into your editing history to be sure.

==Instructions==
<!-- [[User:DoNotArchiveUntil]] 01:17, 18 October 2115 (UTC) -->{{User:ClueBot III/DoNotArchiveUntil|4600804623}}
===Potential candidates===
If you wish, add your name below, then allow the community to provide feedback.  '''Please read [[Wikipedia:Not now]] before adding your name to this list.'''

===Responders===
Responders, please provide a number from 0 to 10 (zero being the lowest and and ten being the highest chance) to give your view on the potential candidate's likelihood of successfully passing an RfA. You can opt to accompany your score with a short comment; please leave any detailed feedback on the user's talk page.

If you see a candidate receiving a favourable response, consider offering an in-depth review and possible nomination offer.

===Sample entry===
<pre><nowiki>
=</nowiki><nowiki>=Example=</nowiki><nowiki>=
{{User-orcp|Example}}
*5/10 - Edits seems okay, but their user page looks like a test page. [[User:Place holder|Place holder]] ([[User talk:Place holder|talk]]) 00:00, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
</nowiki></pre>

{{mbox|text='''[//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/Optional_RfA_candidate_poll&action=edit&section=new&preload=Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/Optional_RfA_candidate_poll/preload Start a poll on your chances of passing RfA]'''|textstyle=text-align:center;|image=none}}

==SBaker43==
{{User-orcp|1=SBaker43}}
*7/10 - [[User:78.26]] [[User:78.26|<span style="border:1px solid black;color:red; padding:1px;background:1h5h1h"><font color="008B8B"><b>78.26</b></font></span>]] <sub>([[User talk:78.26|spin me]] / [[Special:Contributions/78.26|revolutions]])</sub> 21:25, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
*8/10 - [[User:davidwr|davidwr]]/<small><small>([[User_talk:davidwr|talk]])/([[Special:Contributions/Davidwr|contribs]])</small></small> 23:54, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
*10/10 --[[User:Jayron32|<span style="color:#009">Jayron</span>]][[User talk:Jayron32|<b style="color:#090">''32''</b>]] 00:17, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
*7/10 - [[User:Ritchie333|<b style="color:#7F007F">Ritchie333</b>]] [[User talk:Ritchie333|<sup style="color:#7F007F">(talk)</sup>]] [[Special:Contributions/Ritchie333|<sup style="color:#7F007F">(cont)</sup>]] 14:30, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
*7/10 - --[[User:Kudpung|Kudpung กุดผึ้ง]] ([[User talk:Kudpung|talk]]) 17:28, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
*8/10 - maintenance experience is important, but anyone versed in content creation would be able to pick up requisite knowledge easily. '''[[User:Esquivalience|<span style="color: #3BB9FF; font-style: italic; font-family: Lato, sans-serif'">Esquivalience</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Esquivalience|<span style="color:#00B88A;">t</span>]]</sup>''' 20:10, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
*7/10 --[[User:SSTflyer|sst✈]]<sup>''[[User talk:SSTflyer#top|discuss]]</sup>'' 05:33, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
*8/10 '''[[User:Jim Carter|<span style="color:#000000">Jim</span> <span style="border:1px solid transparent; border-radius:99px; background-color:Black"><span style="color:White">Car</span></span><span style="color:#FF0000">ter</span>]]''' 14:13, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
*6/10, you are experienced and competent in content creation, I fear that means you're doomed! ;-)  [[User:Montanabw|<font color="006600">Montanabw</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:Montanabw|<font color="purple">(talk)</font>]]</sup> 22:33, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
*7/10 - [[User:Supdiop|Supdiop]]&nbsp;([[User talk:Supdiop|<small>T</small>]]🔹[[Special:Contributions/Supdiop|<small>C</small>]]) 02:50, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
*7.5/10 [[User:Jianhui67|<b style="color:#0E0">Jianhui67</b>]]<sup> [[User talk:Jianhui67|<b style="color:#1E90FF">T</b>]]<span style="color:red">★</span>[[Special:Contributions/Jianhui67|<b style="color:#1E90FF">C</b>]]</sup> 00:30, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
*5/10 -  [[User:APerson|APerson]] ([[User talk:APerson|talk]]) 19:34, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

==Oiyarbepsy==

{{User-orcp|1=Oiyarbepsy}}

I'll be a guinea pig for this, why not? [[User:Oiyarbepsy|Oiyarbepsy]] ([[User talk:Oiyarbepsy|talk]]) 12:06, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
*6/10 - <small>(please note this would be considerably higher, except your contribution history only goes back just over a year.  10 months from now I'd give this an 8 or more likely 9, the contributions appear exemplary.)</small>  [[User:78.26|<span style="border:1px solid black;color:red; padding:1px;background:1h5h1h"><font color="008B8B"><b>78.26</b></font></span>]] <sub>([[User talk:78.26|spin me]] / [[Special:Contributions/78.26|revolutions]])</sub> 16:37, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
*8/10 - your CSD work in particular looks good. Whether your edit warring on Thine Antique Pen's RfA today will get pulled up and incur a pile-on (hopefully not as it seems to be a one off), who knows. [[User:Ritchie333|<b style="color:#7F007F">Ritchie333</b>]] [[User talk:Ritchie333|<sup style="color:#7F007F">(talk)</sup>]] [[Special:Contributions/Ritchie333|<sup style="color:#7F007F">(cont)</sup>]] 17:20, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
*6.5/10 per a cursory look. '''[[User:Esquivalience|<span style="color: #3BB9FF; font-style: italic; font-family: Lato, sans-serif'">Esquivalience</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Esquivalience|<span style="color:#00B88A;">t</span>]]</sup>''' 20:07, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
*6/10 - you haven't been here long enough to piss off lots of people, but you apparently said something that upset someone, and that's all it takes to attract the swarm ;-)  [[User:Montanabw|<font color="006600">Montanabw</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:Montanabw|<font color="purple">(talk)</font>]]</sup> 22:28, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
*6/10 - Your content and maintenance work is relatively good. Due to the relatively short tenure, and the nature of your participation in one particular meta areas, it could be perceived by some  (though perhaps not so glaringly obvious to others) as if you may have been working almost from the very start towards becoming an admin; I won't characterize on whether that is a pro or a con. [[User:Kudpung|Kudpung กุดผึ้ง]] ([[User talk:Kudpung|talk]]) 01:10, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
* 7/10 Per Ritchie and Kudpung. --[[User:Titodutta|Tito Dutta]] ([[User talk:Titodutta|talk]]) 14:33, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
*5/10 for range of experience and speedy delete nominations. [[User:Graeme Bartlett|Graeme Bartlett]] ([[User talk:Graeme Bartlett|talk]]) 09:39, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
*6.5/10 [[User:Jianhui67|<b style="color:#0E0">Jianhui67</b>]]<sup> [[User talk:Jianhui67|<b style="color:#1E90FF">T</b>]]<span style="color:red">★</span>[[Special:Contributions/Jianhui67|<b style="color:#1E90FF">C</b>]]</sup> 00:31, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

==Sparklism==
{{User-orcp|1=Sparklism}}

I'll play along too :) [[User:Sparklism| — sparklism]] <sup><small>''[[User_talk:Sparklism| hey!]]''</small></sup> 21:58, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
*8/10 - good content; sufficient maintenance contributions. Again, just a cursory look. '''[[User:Esquivalience|<span style="color: #3BB9FF; font-style: italic; font-family: Lato, sans-serif'">Esquivalience</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Esquivalience|<span style="color:#00B88A;">t</span>]]</sup>''' 23:28, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
*8/10 - good content work, good CSD taggings, no major red flags except maybe a lack of recent admin-related work (not much AFD/CSD in the past year, would people find that problematic)? —&nbsp;[[User:The Earwig|<span style="color:#060;">Earwig</span>]]&nbsp;<sup>''[[User talk:The Earwig|<span style="color:#000;">talk</span>]]''</sup> 07:46, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
*9/10 - [[User:78.26|<span style="border:1px solid black;color:red; padding:1px;background:1h5h1h"><font color="008B8B"><b>78.26</b></font></span>]] <sub>([[User talk:78.26|spin me]] / [[Special:Contributions/78.26|revolutions]])</sub> 13:47, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
*9/10 '''''[[User talk:Yash!|<span style="font-family:Bradley Hand ITC;color:black">Yash!</span>]]''''' 17:33, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
*5/10 - you've been here as long as me and you've created lots of excellent content, you must have pissed off someone at some point and that's fatal ;-)  [[User:Montanabw|<font color="006600">Montanabw</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:Montanabw|<font color="purple">(talk)</font>]]</sup> 22:26, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
*9/10 - have worked with Sparklism on a few articles and found him to be a good collaborator. Consider requesting an RfA nomination from someone soon! [[User:Ritchie333|<b style="color:#7F007F">Ritchie333</b>]] [[User talk:Ritchie333|<sup style="color:#7F007F">(talk)</sup>]] [[Special:Contributions/Ritchie333|<sup style="color:#7F007F">(cont)</sup>]] 14:35, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
*7/10 The first edit I looked at broke the rules, but after that logs, nominations and articles looked good. [[User:Graeme Bartlett|Graeme Bartlett]] ([[User talk:Graeme Bartlett|talk]]) 09:52, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
*9/10 but do something about your user page. It's only fair to the people we have to deal with as admins to let them know at least a little bit about ourselves. [[User:Kudpung|Kudpung กุดผึ้ง]] ([[User talk:Kudpung|talk]]) 08:10, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

==Yash!==
{{User-orcp|Yash!}}
* 8/10 --[[User:SSTflyer|sst✈]]<sup>''[[User talk:SSTflyer#top|discuss]]</sup>'' 12:26, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
* 6/10 - [[User:78.26|<span style="border:1px solid black;color:red; padding:1px;background:1h5h1h"><font color="008B8B"><b>78.26</b></font></span>]] <sub>([[User talk:78.26|spin me]] / [[Special:Contributions/78.26|revolutions]])</sub> 13:47, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
*7/10 - you exist in the sweet spot of not having been here too long and no active blocks, but search your name at wikipediocracy; if you appear at all, they will notice...!  [[User:Montanabw|<font color="006600">Montanabw</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:Montanabw|<font color="purple">(talk)</font>]]</sup> 22:29, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
*6/10 - [[User:Supdiop|Supdiop]]&nbsp;([[User talk:Supdiop|<small>T</small>]]🔹[[Special:Contributions/Supdiop|<small>C</small>]]) 02:19, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
*6/10 - you might get some moans over very slight idiosyncrasies in English, not that I think it would be reasonable in your case, but !voters can be strange. [[User:Arthur goes shopping|Arthur goes shopping]] ([[User talk:Arthur goes shopping|talk]]) 12:38, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

==Epicgenius==
{{User-orcp|Epicgenius}}

No way I'll pass, not at this time of year. (I'm thinking of running in late 2016, if I'm still editing by then.) [[User:Epicgenius|epic genius]] ([[User talk:Epicgenius|talk]]) 11:59, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

* <s>6/10</s> If that is the case, I think I will increase it by two i.e. 8/10 if you apply in late 2016 or early 2017, unless anything terrible happens meanwhile. :-p '''[[User:Jim Carter|<span style="color:#000000">Jim</span> <span style="border:1px solid transparent; border-radius:99px; background-color:Black"><span style="color:White">Car</span></span><span style="color:#FF0000">ter</span>]]''' 13:42, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
* 9/10 for your industry, congeniality toward new users, and reliable judgment [[User:Vesuvius Dogg|Vesuvius Dogg]] ([[User talk:Vesuvius Dogg|talk]]) 17:30, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
* <s>7/10</s> 4/10 – You ''should'' pass; unfortunately, with RfA, that doesn't mean you will pass. {{small|(Addendum: Missed the recent block for [[WP:3RR|3RR]] – that means you'll need to wait at least 6 months to have a shot...)}} --[[User:IJBall|IJBall]] <small>([[Special:Contributions/IJBall|contribs]] • [[User talk:IJBall|talk]])</small> 05:52, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
* 7.5/10 [[User:Jianhui67|<b style="color:#0E0">Jianhui67</b>]]<sup> [[User talk:Jianhui67|<b style="color:#1E90FF">T</b>]]<span style="color:red">★</span>[[Special:Contributions/Jianhui67|<b style="color:#1E90FF">C</b>]]</sup> 08:29, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
* <s>7/10. Some voters may not like your fancy user pages. [[User:SSTflyer|sst✈]]<sup>''[[User talk:SSTflyer#top|discuss]]</sup>'' 14:29, 1 November 2015 (UTC)</s> 4/10 per recent 3RR block. [[User:SSTflyer|sst✈]]<sup>''[[User talk:SSTflyer#top|discuss]]''</sup> 07:15, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
* 4/10. No doubt a future admin, but recent block and past activity at drama boards may bring extra opposition.  [[User:78.26|<span style="border:1px solid black;color:red; padding:1px;background:1h5h1h"><font color="008B8B"><b>78.26</b></font></span>]] <sub>([[User talk:78.26|spin me]] / [[Special:Contributions/78.26|revolutions]])</sub> 18:57, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
* 5.5/10. I'm rather concerned that you have 654 edits to ANI. Note also that some of our editors will even hit below the belt to brand someone as mysogininst, especially adminship and arbcom candidates, so be careful what you have on your user page.[[User:Kudpung|Kudpung กุดผึ้ง]] ([[User talk:Kudpung|talk]]) 08:30, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

==LukeSurl==
{{User-orcp|LukeSurl}}

OK, I'll bite :). Like some of the above, I would not consider myself admin material, nor do I have any plans to try to become one. However the comments on the others' requests have been generous and interesting, and I'd appreciate a few similar assessments of my editing. Cheers --[[User:LukeSurl|LukeSurl]]<sup> [[User Talk:LukeSurl|t]] [[Special:Contributions/LukeSurl|c]]</sup> 16:06, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
*8/10 - extremely civil, helpful, and clueful (as your user talk page archives show). Minor quibble: your overall minor edit summary usage is at 86%. [[User:APerson|APerson]]&nbsp;([[User talk:APerson|talk!]]) 18:28, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
*6/10 - If you go for it right now. The inconsistency in your edits per month is something that a lot many editors would object to. If you could show the same editing pattern consistently for 6-8 months more, I'd clearly give you an 8/10. '''''<span style="font-family:Bradley Hand ITC">[[User:Yash!|<span style="color:black">Ya</span>]][[User talk:Yash!|<span style="color:black">sh</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Yash!|<span style="color:black">!</span>]]</span>''''' 01:06, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
*6/10 - longstanding productive editor with clean block log.  A proven civil collaborator.  Some voters will see the inconsistent editing history as noted above, no matter how much I disagree.  I think a bigger concern will be the percentage of recent AfD nominations that have been closed as "keep".  [[User:78.26|<span style="border:1px solid black;color:red; padding:1px;background:1h5h1h"><font color="008B8B"><b>78.26</b></font></span>]] <sub>([[User talk:78.26|spin me]] / [[Special:Contributions/78.26|revolutions]])</sub> 18:21, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

==ONUnicorn==
{{User-orcp|ONUnicorn}}
Why not? I'm not planning on running for RFA any time soon, but the idea has occasionally crossed my mind, and this looks like an interesting experiment to see what people think. ~ ''[[User:ONUnicorn|<span style="color:#0cc">ONUnicorn</span>]]''<sup>([[User talk:ONUnicorn|Talk]]&#124;[[Special:Contributions/ONUnicorn|Contribs]])</sup><small>[[WP:P&amp;S|problem solving]]</small> 16:41, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
* <s>4/10</s>7/10 - I'm struggling to find a diff in article space that is isn't Twinkle or fiddling with templates. Sorry, I need to find ''some'' evidence you won't rip content creators' heads off :-( [[User:Ritchie333|<b style="color:#7F007F">Ritchie333</b>]] [[User talk:Ritchie333|<sup style="color:#7F007F">(talk)</sup>]] [[Special:Contributions/Ritchie333|<sup style="color:#7F007F">(cont)</sup>]] 13:56, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
::{{ping|Ritchie333}} Are you sure you were looking at my contributions and not another users?  I have never used Twinkle, and I rarely edit templates.~ ''[[User:ONUnicorn|<span style="color:#0cc">ONUnicorn</span>]]''<sup>([[User talk:ONUnicorn|Talk]]&#124;[[Special:Contributions/ONUnicorn|Contribs]])</sup><small>[[WP:P&amp;S|problem solving]]</small> 17:52, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
:::Hmm, well it looks like I must have done, sorry about that. I've had another look just now and there is some evidence of article rescue on [[Toxic Girl]], and I think what I meant by "Twinkle" was "Twinkle-esque" by which I mean edit summaries like "Reverted edits by 'x' to version 123 by user 'y'" that don't actually give any reason ''why'' the revert was made. [[User:Ritchie333|<b style="color:#7F007F">Ritchie333</b>]] [[User talk:Ritchie333|<sup style="color:#7F007F">(talk)</sup>]] [[Special:Contributions/Ritchie333|<sup style="color:#7F007F">(cont)</sup>]] 15:44, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
* 6.5/10 – This looks pretty good to me, all around. AfD numbers are OK (but could be better). But voters will probably like your sticking to the Help desk and VPP and [[WP:3O]] over the "drama" boards. The only real potential stumbling block I see is the the relatively long layoff in active editing between 2007 and 2015, and edit count just a hair under 10,000 (but ~50% of those in main space, which is good). --[[User:IJBall|IJBall]] <small>([[Special:Contributions/IJBall|contribs]] • [[User talk:IJBall|talk]])</small> 20:03, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
* 4/10 - I think IJBall hit the nail on the head.  Excellent work overall, but because of the long layoff, I think a significant number would only count the last year of about 3100 edits.  Give it another year of consistent editing, and my evaluation of your chances goes way up.  Some may also be concerned about the less than 70% "correct" voting at AfD.  I say baloney, but that's the way it can go.  [[User:78.26|<span style="border:1px solid black;color:red; padding:1px;background:1h5h1h"><font color="008B8B"><b>78.26</b></font></span>]] <sub>([[User talk:78.26|spin me]] / [[Special:Contributions/78.26|revolutions]])</sub> 21:34, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

==Shoy==
{{User-orcp|Shoy}}
Out of curiosity. [[User:Shoy|shoy]] <small>([[User talk:Shoy|reactions]])</small> 18:40, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
* 5/10 at the moment. There is a long hiatus, you have almost no edits between February 2011 and July 2015. At least 6 months of consistent activity is needed. '''[[User:Jim Carter|<span style="color:#000000">Jim</span> <span style="border:1px solid transparent; border-radius:99px; background-color:Black"><span style="color:White">Car</span></span><span style="color:#FF0000">ter</span>]]''' 15:49, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
* 7/10 content creation, use of buttons, AFD participation is all good. [[User:Graeme Bartlett|Graeme Bartlett]] ([[User talk:Graeme Bartlett|talk]]) 23:09, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
*5/10 that hiatus is too long.I would like to see 12 months of solid editing. Propotionally too many edits are just putting project templates on article talk. --[[User:Kudpung|Kudpung กุดผึ้ง]] ([[User talk:Kudpung|talk]]) 11:45, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
*5/10 good content creation (including article creation on chemicals), good AfD participation, good communication and clean block log, but oh that layoff, including an entire year without activity.  Only 1500 edits in the last 5 years.  [[User:78.26|<span style="border:1px solid black;color:red; padding:1px;background:1h5h1h"><font color="008B8B"><b>78.26</b></font></span>]] <sub>([[User talk:78.26|spin me]] / [[Special:Contributions/78.26|revolutions]])</sub> 21:38, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

==Grapple X==
{{User-orcp|Grapple X}}

For what it's worth, if I ever do proceed with a request it would be intended mostly for advanced gnoming (manning WP:ERRORS, queuing DYK when it's running late, etc). I'm too ogrish to worry about being expected to <s>club users and eat their bones</s> use block functions. [[User:Grapple X|'''G<small>RAPPLE</small>''']] [[User talk:Grapple X|'''<small><sup>X</sup></small>''']] 11:35, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
*6.5/10 Quite promising. But at the moment I will stick to 6.5, due to low activity between 8/2014 and 8/2015. Some people like to see consistent activity for at least 6 months. And I would encourage more activity at [[WP:AFD]]. I may increase the number by 2 after three months of consistent balanced activity. '''[[User:Jim Carter|<span style="color:#000000">Jim</span> <span style="border:1px solid transparent; border-radius:99px; background-color:Black"><span style="color:White">Car</span></span><span style="color:#FF0000">ter</span>]]''' 13:05, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
*6/10 - tenure and edit count is substantial enough, civil and communicative, but low activity in the last 3 years, and minimal AfD participation.  Might pass if clear need for tools in area of expertise were clearly demonstrated.  [[User:78.26|<span style="border:1px solid black;color:red; padding:1px;background:1h5h1h"><font color="008B8B"><b>78.26</b></font></span>]] <sub>([[User talk:78.26|spin me]] / [[Special:Contributions/78.26|revolutions]])</sub> 21:40, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

==Ansh666==
{{User-orcp|Ansh666}}

Just out of curiosity. And, of course, assuming that I return to active editing soon. (Noting that responses here will in no way effect that.) [[User:Ansh666|ansh]][[User talk:Ansh666|<span style="font-size:80%">''666''</span>]] 10:28, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
*<s>4/10</s>6/10 - it doesn't look like you've ever created an article (although I may have missed one), and that 66% AfD rate could be improved. [[User:APerson|APerson]]&nbsp;([[User talk:APerson|talk!]]) 17:10, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
**Just going to note, I do a lot of proxy nominations for IPs, which means that my AfD success rate is essentially meaningless. Forgot to mention. [[User:Ansh666|ansh]][[User talk:Ansh666|<span style="font-size:80%">''666''</span>]] 23:56, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
**:Sure; updated feedback. [[User:APerson|APerson]]&nbsp;([[User talk:APerson|talk!]]) 14:07, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
* 5–6/10.  I've seen you around, and I think you've done a lot of good for Wikipedia.  However, the reality of RfA is that there's a vocal faction who demand evidence of significant content creation.  Not all of them require a GA or FA, but they will balk at your mainspace contribution percentage (23%), number of edits to mainspace (1600), and number of created articles (1).  Some people have passed RfA recently without the support of this faction, but 23% mainspace contributions will be too low for many people. [[User:NinjaRobotPirate|NinjaRobotPirate]] ([[User talk:NinjaRobotPirate|talk]]) 06:17, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
* 4/10. Ansh666, let me say up front that I'd support you in an RfA, and think you'd make a good Admin. But I think there are too many stumbling blocks to you actually passing, primarily a relatively low edit count, and some inconsistent editing levels (e.g. esp. recent relatively low editing activity) – these are things that too many RfA voters look at and base their votes on (unfortunately), and lack of article creaion, and I think it'll be too high a hurdle for you to pass right now. --[[User:IJBall|IJBall]] <small>([[Special:Contributions/IJBall|contribs]] • [[User talk:IJBall|talk]])</small> 19:41, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
* <s>4/10</s>.  Some don't think that <10,000 edits is enough.  Some will think you have too many AfD noms that were closed as keep.  The last will be seen as particularly problematic for those who value content creation over everything else.  [[User:78.26|<span style="border:1px solid black;color:red; padding:1px;background:1h5h1h"><font color="008B8B"><b>78.26</b></font></span>]] <sub>([[User talk:78.26|spin me]] / [[Special:Contributions/78.26|revolutions]])</sub> 21:44, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
**See my comment to APerson above, I would make clear if I ever ran that the vast majority of "my" noms are not actually mine. [[User:Ansh666|ansh]][[User talk:Ansh666|<span style="font-size:80%">''666''</span>]] 23:06, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
:::6/10.  OK, one point per your explanation, and another point for for your ability to clearly explain it {{smiley}}.  I'll still gather your willingness to do this when compared to your lack of article creation will draw opposition, unfair or not.  My opinion is that another 5000 edits within a reasonable time-frame and you are highly likely to pass.  [[User:78.26|<span style="border:1px solid black;color:red; padding:1px;background:1h5h1h"><font color="008B8B"><b>78.26</b></font></span>]] <sub>([[User talk:78.26|spin me]] / [[Special:Contributions/78.26|revolutions]])</sub> 23:51, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

==Cloudbound==
{{User-orcp|Cloudbound}}
I used to go under the name of Wikiwoohoo until February 2010, and put myself forward for adminship five times between 2005 and 2010. I know that five requests will ring alarm bells for some of you, but the first two were far too early, and the third had more support votes but could not reach the general consensus level. 

I'm very active in many of the behind-the-scenes tasks here really, such as checking images are correctly licensed and that we have the most up-to-date files in the best available quality. I do a lot of work primarily in business related articles now, keeping them updated and in good condition, as well as keeping articles trimmed down to be at their best. [[User:Cloudbound|Cloudbound]] ([[User talk:Cloudbound|talk]]) 22:20, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
*6.5/10 - I'd love to give you a higher rating, but that 39% AfD rating is a sticking point for me. (You know how RfA !voters look for at least some experience in all areas of admin work.) You've made wonderful contributions everywhere else, and that ~50% mainspace edit percentage is a big positive. [[User:APerson|APerson]]&nbsp;([[User talk:APerson|talk!]]) 02:28, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
*8/10 - at 40,000 constructive edits, clearly [[WP:HERE]].  You'll get some opposition regarding the AfD rating, not that the participation is all that extensive.  Bigger problem is that you have '''always''' voted delete, although that will be blunted somewhat by your own content creation.  User interaction is mostly templates, but there's enough there to show the editor interacts collaboratively.  [[User:78.26|<span style="border:1px solid black;color:red; padding:1px;background:1h5h1h"><font color="008B8B"><b>78.26</b></font></span>]] <sub>([[User talk:78.26|spin me]] / [[Special:Contributions/78.26|revolutions]])</sub> 00:01, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

==Wildthing61476==
{{User-orcp|1=Wildthing61476}}

I did a self-nomination years ago in a RFA. As time has past (and after an extended wiki-break to handle real life), I feel that my time here on Wikipedia, along with my patience, my ability to communicate and my ability to observe and make critical decision that are for the best of Wikipedia would make me a good choice to become an admin. My time here usually is spent cleaning up after vandals, though I do edit in areas I have expertise with, namely topics about Baltimore and Maryland. [[User:Wildthing61476|Wildthing61476]] ([[User talk:Wildthing61476|talk]]) 22:01, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
*5/10 — I would probably support you in an RfA, but you haven't created an article in several years. Try starting an article and getting it to [[WP:GA|GA status]], if that's not too much of a hassle. <span class="nowrap">— '''[[User:Bilorv|Bilorv]]'''<sub>'''[[User talk:Bilorv|(talk)]]'''</sub><sup>[[Special:Contribs/Bilorv|(c)]][[Special:EmailUser/Bilorv|(e)]]</sup></span> 09:07, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
*4/10 — Your case reads like someone who took a relatively long "layoff" from active editing, and that you have only returned to active editing recently. Thus, I agree with Bilorv – you probably need 6 months more of active editing, and probably need to create a couple of new articles (and/or do the GA thing...). But your AfD work looks good, and I think if you do what's suggested, you'll probably look more like a "7/10" by next spring or summer. --[[User:IJBall|IJBall]] <small>([[Special:Contributions/IJBall|contribs]] • [[User talk:IJBall|talk]])</small> 19:55, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
*4/10, with a positive outlook (hope [[A. M. Best]] doesn't sue...)   It's the layoff thing again, mostly, plus the low percentage of edits in article space.  On the plus side, you are a prolific AfD contributor, with a nice mix of "keep" and "delete" arguments.  You are very helpful to new editors, which is a big reason your article-space % is where it is.  I'd give it a year on the current trajectory, and my estimation of your chance at consensus for admin goes way up.  [[User:78.26|<span style="border:1px solid black;color:red; padding:1px;background:1h5h1h"><font color="008B8B"><b>78.26</b></font></span>]] <sub>([[User talk:78.26|spin me]] / [[Special:Contributions/78.26|revolutions]])</sub> 14:45, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

==Harish.pentapalli==
{{User-orcp|Harish.pentapalli}}

* Hi, Harish.  It never hurts to get feedback, but you really don't have enough edits yet for us to judge your suitability.  Once you've made several thousand edits, you should come back and ask again.  You can get experience by participating in debates at [[WP:RSN]] and [[WP:BLPN]], contributing your views to policy proposals at [[WP:VPP]], and voting at [[WP:AFD]].  You might also consider reporting vandals to [[WP:AIV]] and sock puppets to [[WP:SPI]].  Once you've demonstrated your understanding of policy and shown how you interact with others, we can make a better judgment.  Right now, it's too soon. [[User:NinjaRobotPirate|NinjaRobotPirate]] ([[User talk:NinjaRobotPirate|talk]]) 01:08, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
* 0/10, 3 month tenure is an absolute no-go.--[[User:Ymblanter|Ymblanter]] ([[User talk:Ymblanter|talk]]) 11:29, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
*0/10, participation to low to be measured. Ask again when you have 3,000 edits with most of tem to mainspace. [[User:Kudpung|Kudpung กุดผึ้ง]] ([[User talk:Kudpung|talk]]) 11:48, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
* [[WP:NOTNOW]] --[[User:Titodutta|Tito Dutta]] ([[User talk:Titodutta|talk]]) 12:42, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
* 0/10 -- 102 edits are too low.  '''[[User:Jim Carter|<span style="color:#000000">Jim</span> <span style="border:1px solid transparent; border-radius:99px; background-color:Black"><span style="color:White">Car</span></span><span style="color:#FF0000">ter</span>]]''' 12:46, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
[[Category:Requests for adminship]]
* 0/10 - no basis for evaluation of suitability nor need.  Thank you for your interest, though!  Just edit constructively the areas which interest you, and a demonstrated need for admin tools will probably appear, and become readily apparent to the community as well.  [[User:78.26|<span style="border:1px solid black;color:red; padding:1px;background:1h5h1h"><font color="008B8B"><b>78.26</b></font></span>]] <sub>([[User talk:78.26|spin me]] / [[Special:Contributions/78.26|revolutions]])</sub> 14:49, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

==Samtar==
{{User-orcp|Samtar}}
Just thought I'd ask, seeing as I'm one of very few non-admin ArbCom [[Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2015/Candidates/Samtar|candidates]]. Your advice and brutally honest thoughts are really appreciated <abbr title="Smiling face" style="border-bottom: none;">[[File:Face-smile.svg|18px|link=]]</abbr> [[User:samtar|samtar]]  <sup>[[User talk:Samtar|{<font color="DarkGrey">t</font>}]]</sup> 14:15, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

* 2.5/10 - needs more experienced. At least 10,000 edits, 800 to 1,000 project-space edits, better performance in AFD, at least 10+ article creation --[[User:Titodutta|Tito Dutta]] ([[User talk:Titodutta|talk]]) 12:30, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
:* Thanks for the advice {{u|Titodutta}} <abbr title="Smiling face" style="border-bottom: none;">[[File:Face-smile.svg|18px|link=]]</abbr> [[User:samtar|samtar]]  <sup>[[User talk:Samtar|{<font color="DarkGrey">t</font>}]]</sup> 14:15, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
* 4.5/10 -- 921 edits to mainspace of which almost all of them has been made in the last four months and a significant amount of them are using semi-automated tools. I would recommend a consistent activity for at least 6 months, with a balance between mainspace edits and user talk page edits. Some more content writing will be a definite positive for your future RfA. Cheers! '''[[User:Jim Carter|<span style="color:#000000">Jim</span> <span style="color:#FF0000">Car</span><span style="color:#FFCC00">ter</span>]]''' 12:44, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
:* Thank you {{u|Jim Carter}}, any advice really helps <abbr title="Smiling face" style="border-bottom: none;">[[File:Face-smile.svg|18px|link=]]</abbr> [[User:samtar|samtar]]  <sup>[[User talk:Samtar|{<font color="DarkGrey">t</font>}]]</sup> 14:15, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
* 3/10 - [[WP:NOTQUITEYET|NOTQUITEYET]]. As the others said, a higher edit count (particularly in main space) would help towards a future run. Also, you probably want to get the AfD numbers up. And creating more articles would be good too... ''Addendum:'' Also, if you can manage to help on the "tool" end, that would definitely help a later RfA run IMO. --[[User:IJBall|IJBall]] <small>([[Special:Contributions/IJBall|contribs]] • [[User talk:IJBall|talk]])</small> 19:50, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

==BethNaught==
{{User-orcp|BethNaught}}

* If granted adminship I would expect to do mopwork mainly in deletion, but also in anti-vandalism. When commenting please bear in mind that any RfA in the near future would likely be late December / early January. Thanks for your feedback! [[User:BethNaught|BethNaught]] ([[User talk:BethNaught|talk]]) 09:22, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
* 9/10, do not see any major issues at this point.--[[User:Ymblanter|Ymblanter]] ([[User talk:Ymblanter|talk]]) 10:25, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
* 8/10.  Looks good.  Might get a little bit of opposition due to the lack of dedicated content creation.  {{diff2|689688182|This question}} might cost you a few support votes, too. [[User:NinjaRobotPirate|NinjaRobotPirate]] ([[User talk:NinjaRobotPirate|talk]]) 10:59, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
* 9/10 [[User:Jianhui67|<b style="color:#0E0">Jianhui67</b>]]<sup> [[User talk:Jianhui67|<b style="color:#1E90FF">T</b>]]<span style="color:red">★</span>[[Special:Contributions/Jianhui67|<b style="color:#1E90FF">C</b>]]</sup> 11:24, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
* 9/10 '''[[User:Jim Carter|<span style="color:#000000">Jim</span> <span style="border:1px solid transparent; border-radius:99px; background-color:Black"><span style="color:White">Car</span></span><span style="color:#FF0000">ter</span>]]''' 05:44, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
* 9.5/10 You're a no-brainer. [[User:Oiyarbepsy|Oiyarbepsy]] ([[User talk:Oiyarbepsy|talk]]) 12:41, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

==MrWooHoo==
{{User-orcp|MrWooHoo}} I don't ever plan on EVER getting the mop, and even then I wouldn't run for a couple years because of my lapses of editing. Since there really aren't any other venues where I can ask for advice, what should I improve on in order to ever '''even''' become an RFA candidate? [[User:MrWooHoo|MrWooHoo]] ([[User talk:MrWooHoo|talk]]) 04:03, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

* It looks to me like you're on the right track.  Just keep doing what you've been doing.  Some of your AfD votes are "per nom".  That's fine, but if you want to impress people at RfA, it helps to be more verbose and persuasive.  Maybe create some more articles, help out at [[WP:NPP]], and weigh in at content noticeboards like [[WP:BLPN]] and [[WP:RSN]].  Also, 18% of your total edits are to mainspace, which may be too low for some people. [[User:NinjaRobotPirate|NinjaRobotPirate]] ([[User talk:NinjaRobotPirate|talk]]) 07:46, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
*5/10 -  [[User:APerson|APerson]] ([[User talk:APerson|talk]]) 19:39, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

==KSFT==
{{User-orcp|KSFT}}

Imagine I had another year or two of experience doing what I've been doing for the last six months. I would also appreciate suggestions about what to change for that year or two. [[User:KSFT|<font color="22DD77"><b>KSF</b></font>]][[User talk:KSFT|<font color="2277DD"><b>T</b></font>]][[Special:Contributions/KSFT|<sup><font color="33DD44"><b>C</b></font></sup>]] 21:23, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
*2/10 - Experience. [[User:APerson|APerson]] ([[User talk:APerson|talk]]) 19:37, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
*5/10 -  [[User:APerson|APerson]] ([[User talk:APerson|talk]]) 19:38, 20 November 2015 (UTC)