Difference between revisions 15062070 and 15077474 on enwiki

< previous diff
next diff >
Talk:Desenrascanço
== Deletion discussion ==
''This article has been listed on [[Wikipedia:Votes for deletion]] in the past. See [[/deletion]] for the discussion archive.''

''For past discussions, see: [[Talk:Desenrascanço/archive1]]''

It's currently (2 June 2004) on Vfd again, if you want to weigh in. -- [[User:Jmabel|Jmabel]] 18:53, 2 Jun 2004 (UTC)

== Shame on you ==
(contracted; show full)the whole section is on an unrelated subject, but it only showed one POV so I added another, which is not just mine but that of a lot of people. If there are people who think the two subjects are unrelated why shouldn't the page show that POV as well? If the page can have a POV about the rituals then it must hold others, no? Note that my POV is that the rituals have nothing to do with it and so the whole section should go, but I didn't think it was my place to delete it, so I added the other POV.
⏎
[anonymous]
*''Assina os teus comentários digitando quatro tils seguidos <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>, tens um nome engraçado e até ficava bem nas assinaturas!''
*Again who decides that is related or not are the people who practice it, and it is 100% related even if you think it is not. You problably see praxe, and you simply start guessing what it is. As I said earlier: the subject is desenrascanço ''not'' praxis. The myths surrounding praxis should go in an article about praxis. The aim of this article is info about desenrascanço. -[[User:PedroPVZ|Pedro]] 10:55, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)