Difference between revisions 15045389 and 15062070 on enwiki

< previous diff
next diff >
Talk:Desenrascanço
== Deletion discussion ==
''This article has been listed on [[Wikipedia:Votes for deletion]] in the past. See [[/deletion]] for the discussion archive.''

''For past discussions, see: [[Talk:Desenrascanço/archive1]]''

It's currently (2 June 2004) on Vfd again, if you want to weigh in. -- [[User:Jmabel|Jmabel]] 18:53, 2 Jun 2004 (UTC)

== Shame on you ==
(contracted; show full)
[anonymous]
*I dont see why adding your oppinion on an UNRELATED subject makes it NPOV, in fact it makes it very POVish. Who decides or not it is related to desenrascanço are the people who pratice it and not you or someone else. Sorry a stupid edit, with a lot of POV, favouring a personal view. I'm not reverting it though. -[[User:PedroPVZ|Pedro]] 00:31, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)
⏎
⏎
*Feel free to revert it if you think that's best. I think that the whole section is on an unrelated subject, but it only showed one POV so I added another, which is not just mine but that of a lot of people. If there are people who think the two subjects are unrelated why shouldn't the page show that POV as well? If the page can have a POV about the rituals then it must hold others, no? Note that my POV is that the rituals have nothing to do with it and so the whole section should go, but I didn't think it was my place to delete it, so I added the other POV.