Difference between revisions 44099 and 49841 on enwiki

< previous diff
next diff >
User:24.150.61.63
Welcome to Wikipedia! May I call you "24" for short? [[Ed Poor]]
----
Some stuff by 24.150.61.63 which still needs checking (I'm reluctant to just delete everything, although (s)he's adding stuff so fast there may be no alternative):  [list way out of date, deleted, click 'user's contributions']
(contracted; show full)

Arrogant?  Sure.  I didn't reveal this IP as a matter of policy.  But I am not scared by it.  Why shouldn't you guys all know what the NSA always knows?

:24, you are taking life ''way'' to seriously - calm down, enjoy the ride, have fun. We live in an open and arguably free society in which anyone can do bodily harm to anybody else if they are determined enough. So what? Why write your hands off about it? --[[user:maveric149|maveric149]], Wednesday, April 3, 2002

⏎

⏎
::I tried to redirect "fun" to wikipedia which ought to be non-controversial

::I don't know who "we" are, or why "we" will always live in this "open and arguably free society".  Personally I expect to move from this relatively low level of risk to much higher levels over my lifetime, and developing habits of disclosure related to [[bodily harm]] is a sound strategy if one wishes to face down killers on their own turf, which I do.  I type so fast that it's no skin off my nose to explain myself.

::the most profound debates about the value of freedom and anoynmity and bodily harm are conducted at http://greenpeace.org - by far the world's most rigorous organization regarding "outing" activists or advocates, researchers or whistle blowers.  Do a google.com search on "Greenpeace XXX" where XXX is "etiquette", "anonymous", "anonym", "noms", "freedom and dignity", "bodily harm", "body value", etc.  I don't think anyone that hasn't browsed over there really understands the issues involved in organizing controversial activities online.  And in many places, knowledge is itself very controversial.