Difference between revisions 6105567 and 6105839 on enwiki

< previous diff
next diff >
User:Alerante/Point system
:''This is just a proposition, not policy. See the [[User talk:Alerante/Point_system|talk page]] for all discussion.''

:''Any comments not part of the original page should be signed with four tildes.''

(contracted; show full)

In addition, these ratings are affected by the granting contributor's points. For example, if ExampleUser gains somebody's favor and now has 500 points, JohnDoe's 100% rating is not a 23.8 but a 25, so he has 124 points.

Anonymous users cannot have points, as [[IP address]]es are not guaranteed to only be one person. They will always edit at the base level of zero points.


==Additions (updated 23 September, 20:25 UTC)==

A bureaucrat-like level could be the only level allowed to give points, just as bureaucrats now are the only ones that can bestow administratorhood on a user.⏎
⏎
==Privilege levels==

The number of points that a user has determines how many privileges he or she has. A sample table follows, which is by no means final, rather just a couple of numbers I threw together before Civics and Economics the other day:

{|
|-
!Points
!Permissions given
(contracted; show full)

*Doesn't this turn Wikipedia into a giant flamewar where people will fight over points and punish people with different opinions by penalising them?

==Miscellanea==

I've held off on allowing [[Wikipedia:Developer|Developer]] privileges to be granted by this. The people who run the server should be able to protect its integrity.

<small>[ [[User:Alerante|alerante]] | [[User_talk:Alerante|&#x201c;&#x201d;]] 23:11, 17 Sep 2004 (UTC) ]</small>